Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736591›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery patients and study of direct economic losses.

Qiuxia Zuo, Kexin Zhao, Baoji Dong, Yuan Zhou, Xiao Wang, Adila Maimaiti, Ping Tian

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. RCT-based meta-analysis of povidone-iodine irrigation in spinal surgery: clarifying efficacy and safety.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiuxia Zuo *School of Nursing, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China.
Kexin Zhao *School of Nursing, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China.
Baoji DongInfection Management Department, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830002, China.
Yuan ZhouInfection Management Department, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830063, China.
Xiao WangSchool of Nursing, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China.
Adila MaimaitiSchool of Nursing, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China.
Ping TianInfection Management Department, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830011, China. zz1109431009@163.com.

Funding

The Natural Science Foundation of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 2022D01C564Xinjiang Medical University Student Innovation Training Program Project S202310760071Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Hospital Management Institute YGYJ2024007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) is a serious complication of spine surgery, leading to prolonged hospital stays, re-operations, and economic losses. The aim of the study was to explore the types and quantities of pathogenic bacteria involved, the incidence of SSI, and to identify the independent risk factors and direct economic impact on patients with postoperative SSI in spine surgery.

methodsThe medical records of spine surgery patients from January 2023 to April 2024 at two hospitals in Xinjiang were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with SSIs were included in the case group, and patients without SSIs were matched 1:1 based on hospital, department, age ± 5 years, primary diagnosis, and the specific surgery type. They were then subjected to univariate and multivariate paired logistic regression analyses. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare differences in hospitalization costs and duration of stay between the two groups.

resultsA total of 38 individuals, or 0.63% of the 6018 adults who had spinal procedures, experienced SSI. Findings from the univariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between SSI (p < 0.05), intraoperative bleeding of 300 ml or more, and the duration of indwelling drain use. Many separate risk variables for SSI were found by multivariate regression analysis: combined underlying diseases (OR 2.634, 95% CI 1.02-6.78), days with an indwelling urinary catheter (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.88), and days with an indwelling drain (OR 1.449, 95% CI 1.01-2.07). The most prevalent bacteria identified as causing skin infections were Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. About $1,688.50 in direct economic loss was attributable to SSI in patients undergoing spine surgery.

conclusionsThe presence of combined underlying diseases, extended use of indwelling urinary catheters, and prolonged use of indwelling drains significantly increase the risk of SSI in spine surgery patients.

Indexed as

Surgical Wound InfectionAdultAgedChinaFemaleHospital CostsHumansIncidenceLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedic ProceduresRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSpineDirect economic lossRisk factorsSpinal surgerySurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID39736591
PMCPMC11686983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.