ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
A new distal radius fracture classification depending on the specific fragments through machine learning clustering method.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI Revolution in Orthopedic Biomechanics: From Fracture Classification to Real-Time Simulations.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposesThe objective of this study was to investigate intra-articular distal radius fractures, aiming to provide a comprehensive analysis of fracture patterns and discuss the corresponding treatment strategies for each pattern.
methods294 cases of intra-articular distal radius fractures lines were collected and clustered thorough K-means and hierarchical clustering algorithm. The demographic data of patients and the clinical treatment outcomes were recorded. For functional evaluation, quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, range of motion (ROM) of the wrist joint and the percentage of the grip strength relative to the healthy wrist at 12 months follow-up were evaluated and recorded; For radiographic parameters of volar tilt (VT), radial inclination (RI), and ulnar variance (UV) were obtained; The occurrence of complications was carefully assessed and documented.
resultsTotally 294 patients were included and divided into the volar side affected group and the dorsal side affected groups. And each group was further categorized into three types: type I, with two parts fractures with either one volar/dorsal side intact; type II, with three parts fractures with volar/dorsal side simply affected; and type III, with four parts fractures with volar/dorsal side communited affected. The volar plate fixation was performed as the standard treatment, while the combined plate fixation was used for comminuted dorsal bone defects of the metaphysis and impaction. There were no differences in the postoperative radiograph parameters, functional outcomes and incidences of complications for each type of volar side group and dorsal side group except that the 3.2 type DRFs showed less range of flexion (75.56±7.48)° and extension (61.65±9.9)° than other dorsal types.
conclusionsA new intra-articular distal radius fractures classification was proposed based on the affection condition of volar or dorsal side. The volar plate fixation is an effective treatment for the intra-articular distal radius fractures, while combined plate fixation can be considered as an alternative treatment for dorsal side comminuted fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III a.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.