ArticleBMC women's health2024
Integrating traditional biomarkers and emerging predictors to assess neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer: a multifactorial analysis of Ki-67, CDK4, EGFR, TILs and ctDNA.
Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of the Use of Circulating DNA as a Biomarker in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Advancements in cancer biomarker discovery over fifteen years: diagnostics and prognostic approach in somatic cancer.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Prognostic utility of inflammatory indices and circulating nucleic acids for neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in breast cancer: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to analyse the correlation between the expression of cell proliferation-associated antigen (Ki-67), cell cycle protein-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) with the outcome and prognosis of patients with breast cancer (BC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
methodsWe retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological data of 231 patients with BC who underwent preoperative NACT at XX Hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. Logistic regression models were used to analyse factors influencing NACT efficacy. The Cox risk regression model was used to analyse prognostic factors. The TILs were assessed on pre-treatment biopsies, and ctDNA levels were monitored during NACT. Propensity score matching and subgroup analyses were performed.
resultsAfter 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy, the response rate was 77.92% (180/231), with 58.87% (136/231) achieving pathological complete response (pCR). Multifactorial analysis showed that tumour, node and metastasis (TNM) stage II, EGFR positivity, low Ki-67 expression, CDK4 negativity, non-triple-negative subtypes and effective NACT results were associated with higher pCR rates. Higher TIL levels correlated with increased pCR rates (72.4% for high TILs vs 39.1% for low TILs, p < 0.001). The ctDNA levels decreased significantly in patients with pCR compared with patients without pCR during NACT (p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the 3-year disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in the pCR group (88.9% vs 71.1%, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis revealed varying pCR rates and predictive biomarkers across BC subtypes.
conclusionThe TNM classification, EGFR, Ki-67, CDK4 expression, BC subtype and NACT results have predictive value for pCR in patients with BC. Lower TNM classification, lower Ki-67 expression and EGFR positivity are associated with better outcomes. High TIL levels and significant decreases in ctDNA during NACT correlate with improved response and prognosis. These findings highlight the potential for integrating traditional clinicopathological factors with novel biomarkers for personalised treatment strategies in BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.