Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736575›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Risk factors for methotrexate treatment failure in tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Linru Fu, Xinyan Liu, Zhao Tian, Zhe Du, Xinyi Wang, Xiuqi Wang, Xiaodong Li, Tao Xu, Zhijing Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Linru FuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xinyan LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhao TianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhe DuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xinyi WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiuqi WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaodong LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Tao XuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhijing SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China. sunzhj2001@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEctopic pregnancy (EP) accounts for approximately 2% of all pregnancies, with tubal ectopic pregnancies (TEPs) being the most common type. Methotrexate (MTX) is a noninvasive and effective medical management option for TEP, but failure rates range from 10 to 36%, posing challenges in clinical practice. Identifying risk factors for MTX treatment failure is crucial to improve patient outcomes and guide clinical decision-making. This study aimed to determine the risk factors associated with MTX failure in TEP patients and support personalized treatment strategies.

methodsThis retrospective study included female patients who were diagnosed with TEP at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) between January 2016 and December 2022. Patients received MTX treatment initially, with dosing intervals and protocols varying according to clinical practice. MTX treatment failure was defined as the need for surgery after MTX administration. The study included two groups: patients who failed MTX treatment (n = 91) and those who succeeded in treatment (n = 268). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors of MTX treatment failure. A nomogram was developed to visualize the predictive factors.

resultsA total of 359 patients were included, with 268 (74.7%) succeeding with MTX and 91 (25.3%) required surgery. Specifically, 282 patients (78.6%) received 1-dose MTX, whereas 77 (21.4%) received 2-dose MTX. Univariate analysis revealed that gravidity, previous EP, gestational age, pretreatment β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level, number of MTX treatments, and presence of a visible yolk sac in ultrasound were significant predictors (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that higher gravidity (odds ratio (OR) = 1.2487, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0103 - 1.5433, P = 0.040) and elevated pretreatment β-hCG levels (OR = 1.0006, 95% CI: 1.0004 - 1.0008, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors. Number of MTX treatments was a significant protective factor (OR = 0.4409, 95% CI: 0.2153 - 0.9025, P = 0.025). The nomogram incorporating these six risk factors was developed.

conclusionHigher gravidity and elevated β-hCG levels were significant predictors of MTX failure, while more MTX doses provided a protective effect. These findings underscore the importance of personalized MTX treatment strategies to improve outcomes in TEP. However, the limitations of this study, including its retrospective and single-center design, suggest that further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these results.

trial registrationThe trial is registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn . [registration number: ChiCTR2400081314; registration date: 2024-02-28 (prospectively registered)].

Indexed as

Abortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalMethotrexatePregnancy, TubalTreatment FailureAdultChorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, HumanFemaleHumansNomogramsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalChorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, HumanMethotrexateEctopic pregnancyMethotrexateTubal pregnancyβ-human chorionic gonadotropin

Identifiers

PMID39736575
PMCPMC11686986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.