ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2024
Sex identification in rainbow trout using genomic information and machine learning.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Aquaculture, Processing, Safety, and Traceability in the Industry of Aquatic Products: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sex identification in farmed fish is important for the management of fish stocks and breeding programs, but identification based on visual characteristics is typically difficult or impossible in juvenile or premature fish. The amount of genomic data obtained from farmed fish is rapidly growing with the implementation of genomic selection in aquaculture. In comparison to mammals and birds, ray-finned fishes exhibit a greater diversity of sex determination systems, with an absence of conserved genomic regions. A group of genomic markers located on a standard genotyping array has been reported to potentially be linked with sex determination in rainbow trout. However, the set of markers suitable for sex identification may vary between populations. Sex identification from genomic data is usually performed using probabilistic methods, where suitable markers are known beforehand. In our study, we demonstrated the use of the Extreme Gradient Boosting approach from the supervised machine learning gradient boost framework to predict sex from unimputed genomic data, when the suitability of the markers was unknown a priori. The accuracy of the method was assessed using four simulated datasets with different genotyping error rates and one real dataset from the Finnish Rainbow Trout Breeding Program. The method showed high prediction quality on both simulated and real datasets. For simulated datasets with low (5%) and high (50%) genotyping error rates, the accuracies were 1.0 and 0.60, respectively. In the real data, the method achieved a prediction accuracy of 98%, which is suitable for routine use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.