Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736544›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Proton therapy versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of cavernous sinus benign meningioma, a randomized controlled phase III study protocol (COG-PROTON-01).

Paul Lesueur, Benedicte Clarisse, Justine Lequesne, Idlir Licaj, Loic Feuvret, Dinu Stefan, Damien Ricard, Georges Noel, Jacques Balosso, Marie Lange and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05895344 (Long-term Cognitive and Functional Impact of Proton-therapy or Modern Fractionated Radiotherapy in Cavernous Sinus Meningioma), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05895344 narecruitingnot on this map

Long-term Cognitive and Functional Impact of Proton-therapy or Modern Fractionated Radiotherapy in Cavernous Sinus Meningioma

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Francois BaclesseRan2024 to 2032Enrolled160ConditionsCavernous Sinus Meningioma, Proton-therapy, Photon Radiotherapy, Cognitive ImpairmentArmsProton-therapy, Photon radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Paul LesueurDepartment of Radiation Oncology, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France. paul.lesueur89@gmail.com.
Benedicte ClarisseDepartment of Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Justine LequesneDepartment of Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Idlir LicajDepartment of Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Loic FeuvretDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, 69000, France.
Dinu StefanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Damien RicardDepartment of neurology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Service de Santé des Armées, Clamart, 92140, France.
Georges NoelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, ICANS (Cancerology Institute of Strasbourg-Europe), Strasbourg, France.
Jacques BalossoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Marie LangeDepartment of Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Aurelie CapelDepartment of Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Isabelle Durand-ZaleskiUniversité de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, URCEco, AP-HP, Hôpital de l'Hôtel Dieu, Paris, F-75004, France.
Marie CasteraDepartment of Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Berenice LegrandDepartment of Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Nicolas GoliotDepartment of Radiation Oncology, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Camille HedouDepartment of Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Jean Michel GrellardDepartment of Clinical Research, François Baclesse Center, Caen, 14000, France.
Samuel ValableISTCT UMR 6030-CNRS, Université de Caen-Normandie, Caen, 14000, France.

Funding

Institut National Du Cancer PHRC-K 20-110, INCa-DGOS_15471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProton therapy (PRT) is an innovative radiotherapeutic modality for the treatment of cancer with unique ballistic properties. The depth-dose distribution of a proton beam reduces exposure of healthy tissues to radiations, compared with photon-therapy (XRT). To date, only few indications for proton-therapy, like pediatric cancers, chordomas, or intra-ocular neoplasms, are reimbursed by Health systems. There is no published or recruiting prospective study evaluating the impact of proton-therapy or conventional irradiation on neurocognitive function for meningioma patients. Notably, long-term cognitive or ocular impact of these modern irradiation schemes remains poorly known. Yet, these patients had a long life-expectancy, and are at risk of developing long-term sequelae. Thus, according to its ballistic advantage, an improvement of patient functional outcomes and a reduction of neurocognitive long-term toxicity are expected if tissue sparing proton-therapy is used .Randomized trial seems crucial to further assess proton-therapy indication for patients with cavernous sinus meningioma.

methodsCOG-PROTON-01 is the first worldwide randomized phase III prospective study evaluating long-term toxicity of these two irradiation modalities (PRT and XRT)for the treatment of cavernous sinus meningioma. Primary objective is to compare long-term cognitive and/or functional (visual, hearing, neurological and/or endocrinological) deterioration between patients treated by fractionated proton-therapy (PRT) or photon radiotherapy (XRT), 5 years after the end of irradiation. The primary endpoint is based on the individual neurocognitive test scores (grouped into five cognitive domains: attention, executive functioning, verbal memory, working memory, information processing speed) and on visual, hearing, endocrinological and neurological evaluations, five years after radiotherapy. Eligible patients with low-grade cavernous sinus meningioma will be 1:1 randomised, with stratification on age, sex, MoCA score. Overall, the inclusion of 160 patients is planned (80 in each arm). To be considered as positive, asumming that 47% of patients will not develop long-term cognitive disabilities deficits after XRT radiotherapy,, thus at least 70% of the patients treated with PRT should not develop functional impairment. First inclusions started on September 2023 (NCT05895344 ).

trial registrationThe study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on June 8, 2023 with the following number: NCT05895344.

Indexed as

Cavernous SinusMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaProton TherapyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCognitionIrradiationMeningiomaProtontherapySkull base

Identifiers

PMID39736544
PMCPMC11687058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.