ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2024
Limited use of opioid prescribing guidelines in Dutch emergency departments: results of a nationwide survey.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The role of emergency departments in opioid related harms: A qualitative study among emergency healthcare providers.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, the Netherlands has experienced a notable increase in opioid prescriptions and associated fatalities. Emergency department (ED) patients exhibit relatively high rates of opioid use (15%) and misuse (23% of patients who present to the ED and use prescription opioids test positive for misuse). To mitigate opioid-related harm, the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) advocates for the use of non-opioid analgesics and minimal opioid prescriptions. In the Netherlands, the Society for Anesthesiology has issued a guideline for appropriate opioid use, which are also relevant to EDs. However, the extent of implementation in EDs remains unclear. This study utilized an online survey to assess the implementation of opioid-prescribing guidelines in Dutch EDs. Chief medical officers from various EDs across the Netherlands were invited via email to complete questionnaires. These questionnaires gathered general information about the EDs, details on the application of opioid-prescribing guidelines, management of problematic opioid use, and specifics of the guidelines in practice.
resultsQuestionnaires were completed by chief medical officers from 33 Dutch EDs, yielding a 52.4% response rate. Nineteen EDs (57.6%) used guidelines for opioid prescribing, predominantly local protocols, with only two of them (10.5%) using the national guideline. The guidelines varied in content, with 68.4% advising on specific opioids (mainly preferring oxycodone) and dosage, and in 63.2% giving advice on prescription duration (typically 3-7 days). Patient education with opioid prescriptions was specified in the guidelines at 57.9% (11/19) of EDs, with brochures provided at 17.6% (6/19) of EDs. The primary focus of patient education was on adverse effects, with addiction risks mentioned at 36.4% (4/11) EDs.
conclusionsThis study reveals significant variability and gaps in opioid prescribing guidelines across Dutch EDs. Compared to US guidelines, Dutch practices are less cautious, highlighting the need for improvement. This study underscores the necessity for a Dutch guideline tailored for EDs to manage opioid prescriptions and problematic opioid use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.