ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024
An retrospective study on the effects of deep learning model-based optimization emergency nursing on treatment compliance and curative effect of patients with acute left heart failure.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBased on explainable DenseNet model, the therapeutic effects of optimization nursing on patients with acute left heart failure (ALHF) and its application values were discussed.
methodIn this study, 96 patients with ALHF in the emergency department of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were selected. According to different nursing methods, they were divided into conventional group and optimization group. Activity of daily living (ADL) scale was used to evaluate ADL of patients 6 months after discharge. Self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were employed to assess patients' psychological state. 45 min improvement rate, 60 min show efficiency, rescue success rate, and transfer rate were used to assess the effect of first aid. Likert 5-level scoring method was adopted to evaluate nursing satisfaction.
resultsThe optimization group showed shorter durations for first aid, hospitalization, electrocardiography, vein channel establishment, and blood collection compared to the conventional group. However, their SBP, DBP, and HR were inferior. On the other hand, LVEF and FS were significantly better in the optimization group. After nursing intervention, SAS and SDS scores were lower in the optimization group. Additionally, the optimization group had higher 45-minute improvement rates, 60-minute show efficiency, rescue success, and transfer rates. They also performed better in 6-minute walking distance and ADL scores 6 months post-discharge. The optimization group had better compliance, total effective rates, and satisfaction than the conventional group.
conclusionIt was demonstrated that explainable DenseNet model had application values in the diagnosis of ALHF. Optimization emergency method could effectively shorten the duration of first aid, relieve anxiety, and other adverse emotions, and improve rescue success rate and short-term efficacy. Nursing intervention has a positive impact on the total effective efficiency and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.