ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2025
The Site of Protonation Affects the Dissociation of Protonated α- and β-Pinene Ions.
Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpretation of α-Pinene Mass Spectra in APCI-Like Ambient Mass Spectrometry Using GC-Coupled Atmospheric Pressure Corona Discharge Ionization.Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleIn electrospray ionization and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, the protonation site directly guides the ion's dissociation. But what if the site of protonation is ambiguous? In this study, we explored the unimolecular reactions of protonated α- and β-pinene ions with a combination of tandem mass spectrometry and theory. Each has multiple potential protonation sites that influence their chemistry.
methodsAtmospheric pressure chemical ionization was employed to form the protonated pinene isomers. The unimolecular chemistry of these ions was explored with a Waters Ultima triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer using energy-resolved collision-induced dissociation with argon collision gas. Reaction mechanisms were calculated with CBS-QB3 single-point energy calculations on B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) optimized structures.
resultsThe two main dissociation reactions in each ion lead to the loss of neutral propene and isobutene. Both ions were found to dissociate over the same minimum energy reaction pathway, the only difference being the site of initial protonation. α-Pinene preferentially protonates at the bridging carbon, while β-pinene can only significantly protonate at the exocyclic double bond. This leads to a lower appearance energy for loss of isobutene, and thus relatively greater m/z 81 fragment ion abundance for β-pinene.
conclusionsThe distinct sites of initial protonation result in the subtle differences observed in the CID of α- and β-pinene. The work highlights that it is not necessarily the "lowest energy" ion that will be formed in the ion source, and any distribution of initial structures must be accounted for when examining CID mass spectra.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.