Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736097›Full record

SynthesisComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2025

Recent advances in examining the factors influencing the efficacy of biocides against Listeria monocytogenes biofilms in the food industry: A systematic review.

Michael Arthur, Edmund Larbi Afari, Elena-Alexandra Alexa, Mei-Jun Zhu, Michael T Gaffney, Jesus Maria Frias Celayeta, Catherine M Burgess

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael ArthurFood Safety Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1481-1694
Edmund Larbi AfariSchool of Food Science, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7768-3397
Elena-Alexandra AlexaSchool of Food Science and Environmental Health, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Mei-Jun ZhuSchool of Food Science, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Michael T GaffneyHorticulture Development Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland.
Jesus Maria Frias CelayetaSustainability and Health Research Hub, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5424-5167
Catherine M BurgessFood Safety Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3722-5935

Funding

Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, IrelandTeagasc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlling Listeria monocytogenes and its associated biofilms in the food industry requires various disinfection techniques, including physical, chemical, and biological treatments. Biocides, owing to their ease of use, cost-effectiveness, dissolvability in water, and efficacy against a wide range of microorganisms, are frequently selected options. Nonetheless, concerns have been raised about their efficacy in controlling L. monocytogenes biofilm, as laboratory-based and commercial studies have reported the persistence of this bacterium after cleaning and disinfection. This review systematically examined scientific studies, sourced from the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases between January 2010 and May 2024, that investigated the effectiveness of the most commonly used biocides in the food industry against L. monocytogenes biofilms. A total of 92 articles which met the screening criteria, were included, with studies utilizing biocides containing sodium hypochlorite, quaternary ammonium compounds, and peroxyacetic acid being predominant. Studies indicated that several key factors may potentially influence biocides' efficacy against L. monocytogenes biofilms. These factors included strain type (persistent, sporadic), serotype, strain origin (clinical, environmental, or food), surface type (biotic or abiotic), surface material (stainless steel, polystyrene, etc.), incubation time (biofilm age) and temperature, presence of organic matter, biocide's active agent, and the co-culture of L. monocytogenes with other bacteria. The induction of the viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state following disinfection is also a critical concern. This review aims to provide a global understanding of how L. monocytogenes biofilms respond to biocides under different treatment conditions, facilitating the development of effective cleaning and disinfection strategies in the food industry.

Indexed as

BiofilmsDisinfectantsFood MicrobiologyListeria monocytogenesDisinfectionFood IndustryDisinfectantsbiocidedisinfectionefficacyListeria monocytogenes biofilmVBNC

Identifiers

PMID39736097
PMCPMC11684510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.