ReviewCJC open2024
Thrombus on Mitral Annular Calcification: A Systematic Review of Management and Outcomes.
Review in CJC open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Thrombus on Mitral Annular Calcification: A Systematic Review of Management and Outcomes.CJC open · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is a common chronic degenerative process of the mitral valve. Thrombus formation on MAC is a rare complication that likely contributes to the increased risk of thromboembolic events. Outcomes and management strategies for this condition are unknown. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to describe the management and outcomes of patients who have thrombus on MAC. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Patients with a prior mitral valve intervention or prosthesis were excluded. The primary outcomes were treatment, mortality, and thromboembolic events. Results: Fifteen studies, with a total of 22 cases (patients aged 69.1 ± 14.8 years; n = 18 [82%] female) were included. Most patients presented with stroke or a transient ischemic event (n = 15; 68%) or myocardial infarction (n = 4; 18%). All patients were diagnosed with either transthoracic (n = 18; 82%) or transesophageal (n = 4; 18%) echocardiography. Seventeen patients (77%) were treated with anticoagulation therapy alone, and 5 (23%) required surgery. The most common surgical indication was prevention of recurrent embolization (n = 3; 14%). No mortality was reported. Six patients (27%) had thromboembolic events after diagnosis. For those treated with anticoagulation therapy alone, 5 (23%) had persistent thrombus with or without embolization. Conclusions: In this systematic review, patients with MAC who present with a thromboembolic event require careful echocardiographic assessment of the MAC, to exclude the presence of thrombus. Although most patients can be managed with anticoagulation therapy alone, a significant number will require surgery. Persistent thrombus, despite anticoagulation therapy, and recurrent embolization are common. Larger studies are needed to elucidate what constitutes the optimal long-term care for these patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.