ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2024
Individualized Cell-Free DNA Monitoring With Chromosomal Junctions for Mesothelioma.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in resectable diffuse pleural mesothelioma: a phase 2 trial and ctDNA analyses.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of Innate Immune System, Body Habitus, and Sex on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anetumab Ravtansine in Patients With Cancer.Clinical and translational science · 2025Trial
- Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Mesothelioma: Drivers of Inflammation and Therapeutic Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The spatially complex nature of mesothelioma and interventions like pleurodesis, surgery, and radiation often complicate imaging-based assessment. Further, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) based monitoring strategies are inadequate for mesothelioma, given the presence of a few recurring nonsynonymous somatic variants. However, patient-specific chromosomal rearrangements are commonly found in mesothelioma. Our study objective was to develop an individualized cfDNA assay to enable blood-based monitoring using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in mesothelioma. We hypothesized that the unique chromosomal rearrangement junctions found in mesothelioma could be employed for individualized ctDNA detection and disease monitoring. Methods: DNA was extracted from tumor specimens for whole genome sequencing. Chromosomal junctions, prioritized by highest allele frequency and low homology to the rest of the genome, were selected for detection. Primers and Taqman probes were designed to span the junctions, forming personalized junction panels. Patient plasma obtained before therapy and at response assessment was tested for the presence of personalized junctions via quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: Our study included nine patients, four with peritoneal and five with pleural mesothelioma. 763 chromosomal junctions were identified in the tumors of all cases. We selected three to five junctions per sample for quantitative polymerase chain reaction. We detected 25/30 (83%) of selected junctions in the plasma of seven out of nine patients (78%). Cell-free junction detection at follow-up was concordant with disease status: cfDNA junctions were detected in three patients with persistent disease, and not detected in a patient with no evidence of disease after surgery. Conclusions: With further validation, individualized ctDNA junction assays could supplement imaging for disease monitoring in mesothelioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.