Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735890›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2024

Individualized Cell-Free DNA Monitoring With Chromosomal Junctions for Mesothelioma.

Kaushal Parikh, Faye R Harris, Giannoula Karagouga, Amy Schrandt, Jay Mandrekar, Sarah Johnson, Alexa McCune, Dorsay Sadeghian, Debarshi Roy, Katarzyna Polonis and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Kaushal ParikhMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Faye R HarrisMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Giannoula KaragougaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Amy SchrandtMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jay MandrekarMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sarah JohnsonMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Alexa McCuneMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Dorsay SadeghianMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Debarshi RoyMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Katarzyna PolonisMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Athanasios GaitatzesMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Aaron O BungumMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Eric S EdellMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mitesh J BoradMayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Tobias PeikertMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Farhad KosariMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John ChevilleMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
George VasmatzisMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Aaron S MansfieldMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Lila J. Rutten · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Blood-based biomarker of therapeutic efficacy for mesotheliomaR21CA251923 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MANSFIELD, AARON SCOTT · 2020 to 2020
$409k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS R21 CA251923NIOSH CDC HHS U24 OH009077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The spatially complex nature of mesothelioma and interventions like pleurodesis, surgery, and radiation often complicate imaging-based assessment. Further, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) based monitoring strategies are inadequate for mesothelioma, given the presence of a few recurring nonsynonymous somatic variants. However, patient-specific chromosomal rearrangements are commonly found in mesothelioma. Our study objective was to develop an individualized cfDNA assay to enable blood-based monitoring using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in mesothelioma. We hypothesized that the unique chromosomal rearrangement junctions found in mesothelioma could be employed for individualized ctDNA detection and disease monitoring. Methods: DNA was extracted from tumor specimens for whole genome sequencing. Chromosomal junctions, prioritized by highest allele frequency and low homology to the rest of the genome, were selected for detection. Primers and Taqman probes were designed to span the junctions, forming personalized junction panels. Patient plasma obtained before therapy and at response assessment was tested for the presence of personalized junctions via quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: Our study included nine patients, four with peritoneal and five with pleural mesothelioma. 763 chromosomal junctions were identified in the tumors of all cases. We selected three to five junctions per sample for quantitative polymerase chain reaction. We detected 25/30 (83%) of selected junctions in the plasma of seven out of nine patients (78%). Cell-free junction detection at follow-up was concordant with disease status: cfDNA junctions were detected in three patients with persistent disease, and not detected in a patient with no evidence of disease after surgery. Conclusions: With further validation, individualized ctDNA junction assays could supplement imaging for disease monitoring in mesothelioma.

Indexed as

Cell-free DNAChromosomal rearrangementsMesothelioma

Identifiers

PMID39735890
PMCPMC11671685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.