ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Dual-Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Obesity, Morbid Obesity and Super-Obesity: Medium-Term Outcomes of a Series of 180 Hips.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obesity has been consistently proven to be associated with an increased risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise globally, it is of vital importance to minimise risks, including dislocation rates, in these patients undergoing THA. Methods: We describe a series of patients with obesity, morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) and super-obesity (BMI ≥ 50) undergoing THA at our institution over a 10-year period using a dual-mobility acetabular cup. The dislocation rate and all-cause revision rate were used as primary outcome measures. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) were assessed using the Oxford hip score (OHS) and VAS score. We assessed for differences in PROMS after grouping patients into BMI ranges of 30-34.9, 35-39.9, 40-49.9 and > 50. Results: A total of 180 dual-mobility THAs in 162 patients were included of which 36 hips had BMI ≥ 40 and 8 hips had BMI ≥ 50. The mean age was 64.2 (29-88) years and the mean follow-up period was 52.1 months (13-122 months). The all-cause revision rate was 2.2% and no patient had a post-operative dislocation. The survivorship of the acetabular component was 100% with the maximum follow-up being 10.1 years. The mean OHS was 43.82 ± 3.29 (30-48) and the mean VAS for pain from the hip was 0.94 ± 1.34 (0-8). No significant difference in PROMS was found between the four BMI ranges. Conclusion: Our results indicate excellent mid-term survivorship, and improvement over traditional dislocation rates in high BMI patients with a dual-mobility THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.