ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Effect of Approach Based Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters and Functional Outcomes: Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF).
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost and Utilization Trends of Lumbar Fusion.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of the efficacy and functional recovery of unilateral biportal endoscopy-assisted lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) are the most commonly conducted operations for interbody fusions. In addition to fusion, the restoration of proper spinal alignment has become crucial for achieving favorable functional outcomes. There is a lack of agreement on which lumbar interbody fusion technique provides the most effective correction for sagittal spinopelvic parameters (SSPs). This study aims to investigate the functional outcome in terms of SSPs in patients undergoing single level OLIF and TLIF for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Methodology: Retrospective analysis of single level OLIF or TLIF was done. The patients' index and follow-up data until 6 months of surgery were collected. Radiographic parameters analysis included disc height (DH), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic index, lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL). Clinical outcomes were recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: In a total of 38 patients (19 in each group) mean age was 51.52 ± 12.67 years in OLIF and 52.17 ± 9.73 years in TLIF. Improvement in DH was more in OLIF but not statistically significant (p = 0.075). Significant improvements were seen in PT, and SL post-TLIF. Change in SSPs among groups shown no significant differences. Both VAS and ODI shown improvements in both the groups but no significant difference was noted while comparing the two groups. Conclusion: The study showed better restoration of SSPs by TLIF in terms of PT and SL although functional outcomes appear similar in both procedures. Increase in DH is the important determinant for resulting good outcome. Patients with maintained spinopelvic balance can be treated satisfactorily with less-invasive OLIF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.