Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735871›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025

Ultrasound as a Diagnostic Modality in Hand and Wrist Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Narrative Review.

J Terrence Jose Jerome

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J Terrence Jose JeromeDepartment of Orthopedics, Hand, and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Olympia Hospital & Research Centre, 47, 47A Puthur High Road, Puthur, Trichy, Tamilnadu 620017 India.ORCID 0000-0003-3321-9255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal ultrasonography of the hand and wrist is becoming the trend in assessing and diagnosing most hand and wrist injuries, soft-tissue mass, and occult fractures. Its advantages include ultra-high frequency probes, noninvasiveness, cost-effectiveness, lack of ionising radiation, and portability. The patients are comfortable doing this procedure in the outpatient department, and visualising the ultrasound images increases their confidence. Conclusions: Ultrasound has a practical and dynamic real-time diagnostic capability compared to other modalities, playing an important role in hand and wrist pathologies. Apart from the diagnostic utility, it has also been beneficial in musculoskeletal intervention procedures, such as trigger finger, carpal tunnel syndrome, and various tenosynovitis. The learning curve and limited deeper penetrations are relative limitations to ultrasound usage. More dedicated training centres and modules for future generations and CT/MRI for deeper structures are always an alternative. This article reviews the role of ultrasound in hand and wrist pathologies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01206-3.

Indexed as

Diagnostic modalityEffectiveHand and wristUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39735871
PMCPMC11680561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.