ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
A bibliometric analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysm (2014-2024).
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An endovascular porcine model of abdominal aortic aneurysm for interventional radiology research.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Bridging macro bibliometrics and micro molecular mechanisms: an integrated analysis of global aortic dissection research.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a localized bulge of the abdominal aorta, which mainly manifests as a pulsatile mass in the abdomen. Once an abdominal aortic aneurysm ruptures, the patient's life is seriously endangered. Surgery is the preferred treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm. At present, there has been no comprehensive review of the current status of abdominal aortic aneurysm research. Therefore, this study aimed to identify global trends in abdominal aortic aneurysm research over the last 10 years through bibliometric analysis and to inform clinical practice, research funding allocation, and decision-making. Methods: We downloaded research articles and reviews on abdominal aortic aneurysm from 1 January 2014, to 1 March 2024, from the Web of Science core collection. CiteSpace (version 6.2.1), RStudio and VOSviewer (version 1.6.18) were used for visual analysis of regional distribution, institutions, authors, keywords and other information. Results: The number of documents on abdominal aortic aneurysm research increased continuously and has stabilized in recent years. A total of 9,905 publications from 67 countries were published from 1 January 2014, to 1 March 2024. A total of 2,142 (29.52%) studies were from the United States, 1,293 (13.05%) were from China, and 919 (9.28%) were from the United Kingdom. A total of 205 studies were conducted at Stanford University, 172 were conducted at Harvard Medical School, and 165 were conducted at the Mayo Clinic. The top three coauthorship authors were Schermerhorn, Marc L (114); Golledge, Jonathan (102); and De Vries, Jean Paul P.M. (74). The most cocited reference was Chaikof EL, 2018, J Vasc Surg, v67, p. 2; the most cocited journal was the Journal of Vascular Surgery; and the most cocited author was Lederle, FA. "Abdominal aortic aneurysm" was the most frequently used author keyword (2,492). Twenty-five references with strong citation bursts were identified by "CiteSpace". "Artificial intelligence", "clinical outcomes" and "bridging stent" were the primary keywords of emerging research hotspots. Conclusion: This is the first bibliometric study to comprehensively summarize the research trends in abdominal aortic aneurysm research. This information can help us to identify the current research hotspots and directions. This study will provide extensive help for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.