Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735824›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2024

Breaking Bad News to Learners: How Well Does the SPIKES Clinical Model Translate?

Lynnea M Mills, Olle Ten Cate, Christy Boscardin, Patricia S O'Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lynnea M MillsUniversity of California, San Francisco, US.ORCID 0000-0001-6128-747X
Olle Ten CateUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, NL.ORCID 0000-0002-6379-8780
Christy BoscardinUniversity of California, San Francisco, US.ORCID 0000-0002-9070-8859
Patricia S O'SullivanUniversity of California, San Francisco, US.ORCID 0000-0002-8706-4095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When health professions learners do not meet standards on assessments, educators need to share this information with the learners and determine next steps to improve their performance. Those conversations can be difficult, and educators may lack confidence or skill in holding them. For clinician-educators with experience sharing challenging news with patients, using an analogy from clinical settings may help with these conversations in the education context. One common model in the clinical setting for 'breaking bad news' to patients is SPIKES: Set-up, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotion, and Summary/Strategy. The authors reviewed evidence in the education setting, particularly from the remediation literature, to consider how the SPIKES model might translate from clinical settings to those in which educators must share 'bad news' with learners about their academic performance. Based on available guidelines and evidence, the authors advocate that the SPIKES model can serve as a useful framework to help educators incorporate, by way of analogy, key components into these conversations, and increase the likelihood of successful outcomes.

Indexed as

Truth DisclosureCommunicationHumans

Identifiers

PMID39735824
PMCPMC11673468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.