Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735758›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Intra-household joint decision making on child feeding and associated social determinants in rural districts of South Ethiopia: a multi-site concurrent mixed method study.

Kassahun Fikadu, Abinet Takele, Biruk Tesfaye, Zeleke Hailemariam Abebo

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kassahun Fikadu *Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Arba Minch Universiy, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Abinet TakeleSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Science, Arba Minch Universiy, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Biruk TesfayeMaternal and Child Health Department, Ethiopian Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Zeleke Hailemariam Abebo *School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Improving joint intra-household decision-making by spouses is a promising solution to improve child-feeding practices. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the status and barriers of intra-household joint decision making on child feeding in rural districts of South Ethiopia from the perspectives of primary caregivers and key individuals. Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted from July 15 to September 15, 2023 in three randomly selected rural districts: Arba Minch Zuria, Mierab Abaya, and Chencha, in Southern Ethiopia. We employed a cross-sectional study design to collect quantitative data. A computer generated random number technique was used to include 25% of the total kebeles from each district. A total of 20 kebeles; 8 from 32 kebeles of chencha, 6 from 24 kebeles of Mierab Abaya, and 6 from 24 kebeles of Arba Minch Zuria were included. A total of 1,479 women with their children aged 6-23 months were recruited from family folder of the health extension program using a simple random sampling technique. A descriptive qualitative study design was used to collect data from 51 focus group discussants and 12 key informants. Trained health professionals collected the data using a structured and pre-tested interviewer administered questionnaire and semi-structured interviewer guide for quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Univariate analysis was used to determine the frequency and percentages while Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the associated factors. The odds ratio with a 95%CI was computed to assess strength of the association. The principles of saturation were adhered during the qualitative data collection. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data in themes and subthemes, using ATLAS.ti version 23. Results: Overall, more than two-thirds (69.2%) of the intra-household decision-making regarding child feeding were found to be jointly decided by the spouses. Women with formal education (AOR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.37-2.46), husband involvement in child feeding (AOR = 2.23, 95%CI: 1.70-2.92), having fewer than or equal to three children (AOR = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.11-2.04), women aged 25-34 years (AOR = 1.57, 95%CI: 1.19-2.07) and 35-49 years (AOR = 2.14, 95%CI: 1.38-3.33) were significantly associated with joint decision-making regarding child feeding practices. Moreover, large family sizes, large age gaps between husbands and wives, and gender inequalities were identified as barriers to women's engagement in intra-household decision making based on qualitative analysis. Conclusion: In the rural districts of southern Ethiopia, joint intra-household decision making regarding child feeding was found to be satisfactory. Maternal education, husband's involvement in child feeding, mother's age, and number of children were independent variables that significantly influenced women's engagement in joint intra-household decision making on child feeding. Interventions targeted at improving women's engagement in decision-making should consider the following sociocultural barriers: extreme age differences between couples, large family sizes, and detrimental gender-oriented norms.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingEthiopiaFamily CharacteristicsFeeding BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial Determinants of HealthSpousesbarriersfactorsjoint intra-household decision makingsocio-economicSouth Ethiopia

Identifiers

PMID39735758
PMCPMC11672791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.