ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024
Deep learning-based automated diagnosis of temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement and its clinical application.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach for Determining the Risk of Temporomandibular Disorders.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Deep learning for automated detection and classification of temporomandibular joint disorders: A scoping review.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis of Temporomandibular and Cranio-Cervico-Mandibular Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence vs. Human Experts in Temporomandibular Joint MRI Interpretation: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Host-microbiome-immune disequilibrium in oral disease: mechanisms, dysbiosis, and precision therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Global research trends in MRI of temporomandibular disorders: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis via CiteSpace.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based method for interpreting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anterior disc displacement (ADD) and to formulate an automated diagnostic system for clinical practice. Methods: The deep learning models were utilized to identify regions of interest (ROI), segment TMJ structures including the articular disc, condyle, glenoid fossa, and articular tubercle, and classify TMJ ADD. The models employed Grad-CAM heatmaps and segmentation annotation diagrams for visual diagnostic predictions and were deployed for clinical application. We constructed four deep-learning models based on the ResNet101_vd framework utilizing an MRI dataset of 618 TMJ cases collected from two hospitals (Hospitals SS and SG) and a dataset of 840 TMJ MRI scans from October 2022 to July 2023. The training and validation datasets included 700 images from Hospital SS, which were used to develop the models. Model performance was assessed using 140 images from Hospital SS (internal validity test) and 140 images from Hospital SG (external validity test). The first model identified the ROI, the second automated the segmentation of anatomical components, and the third and fourth models performed classification tasks based on segmentation and non-segmentation approaches. MRI images were classified into four categories: normal (closed mouth), ADD (closed mouth), normal (open mouth), and ADD (open mouth). Combined findings from open and closed-mouth positions provided conclusive diagnoses. Data augmentation techniques were used to prevent overfitting and enhance model robustness. The models were assessed using performance metrics such as precision, recall, mean average precision (mAP), F1-score, Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and confusion matrix analysis. Results: Despite lower performance with Hospital SG's data than Hospital SS's, both achieved satisfactory results. Classification models demonstrated high precision rates above 92%, with the segmentation-based model outperforming the non-segmentation model in overall and category-specific metrics. Discussion: In summary, our deep learning models exhibited high accuracy in detecting TMJ ADD and provided interpretable, visualized predictive results. These models can be integrated with clinical examinations to enhance diagnostic precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.