Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735715›Full record

ArticlePlant and soil2024

Horticultural additives influence peat biogeochemistry and increase short-term CO

Bidhya Sharma, Tim R Moore, Klaus-Holger Knorr, Henning Teickner, Peter M J Douglas, Nigel T Roulet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant and soil, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bidhya SharmaDepartment of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-5897-6714
Tim R MooreDepartment of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Klaus-Holger KnorrInstitute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Henning TeicknerInstitute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Peter M J DouglasDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Geotop Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Nigel T RouletDepartment of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Peat is used as a major ingredient of growing media in horticulture. Peat extracted from bogs can be acidic and low in nutrient availability and is therefore mixed with liming agents, nutrients, surfactants, perlite and so on. This study aims to estimate the rates at which raw peat and the modified peat ('growing media') decompose to release carbon dioxide (CO Methods: We obtained 28 and 24 samples of raw peat and 24 growing media from four peat extraction companies in Canada. Growing media were treated with horticultural additives. We incubated the samples under laboratory conditions, measuring CO Results: C:N ratio, pH, dissolved organic carbon, bulk density and C content differed significantly ( Conclusion: Our results provide the rates (0.15 ± 0.017mgCO Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11104-024-06685-9.

Indexed as

CO2 fluxesGrowing mediaHorticultural peatHorticulturePeat biogeochemistryPeat decomposition

Identifiers

PMID39735715
PMCPMC11680665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.