ArticleHeliyon2024
Robust integer optimization of turning parameters for cutting tool sustainability and machining economics in discrete production.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machining optimization is crucial for determining cutting parameters that enhance machining economics. However, few studies address the significant variation in cutting tool wear and the complexities of discrete production, often leading to lower cutting parameters to prevent operational failures. Moreover, variations in part geometries lead to differing contact conditions between the cutting tool and workpiece, as well as variations in material removal. This study employs a robust optimization approach tailored for discrete workpieces to experimentally determine optimal cutting parameters that balance machining efficiency with cutting tool sustainability. An objective function was proposed to integrate tool wear probability and the number of workpieces, with case studies demonstrating its critical role in enhancing efficiency while achieving a tool overuse probability below 2.1 %. Our experiments reveal that processing either too few or too many parts with a single insert can escalate costs due to extreme tool wear or decreased efficiency; notably, the optimal number of parts to be machined was found to be four, yielding an objective function value of 380.6 NTD, which is lower than 394.5 NTD for three parts and 405.4 NTD for five parts in the case study. This research underscores the necessity of considering tool wear distribution and discrete production in machining optimization for sustainable manufacturing applications, providing valuable insights into the impact of cutting parameters and tool wear distribution on the costs for discrete production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.