Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735601›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status of lung adenocarcinoma based on PET/CT images using deep learning.

Lele Huang, Weifang Kong, Yongjun Luo, Hongjun Xie, Jiangyan Liu, Xin Zhang, Guojin Zhang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lele Huang *Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Hospital and Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Weifang Kong *Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yongjun Luo *Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Hospital and Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Hongjun XieDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jiangyan LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Hospital and Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceuticals Diagnosis, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Guojin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to develop deep learning models based on Methods: We enrolled 430 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer from two institutions in this study. The advanced Inception V3 model to predict EGFR mutations based on PET/CT images and developed CT, PET, and PET + CT models was used. Additionally, each patient's clinical characteristics (age, sex, and smoking history) and 18 CT features were recorded and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified the independent risk factors for EGFR mutations, and a clinical model was established. The performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, recall, and F1-value was evaluated. The DeLong test was used to compare the predictive performance across various models. Results: Among these four models, deep learning models based on CT and PET + CT exhibit the same predictive performance, followed by PET and the clinical model. The AUC values for CT, PET, PET + CT, and clinical models in the training set are 0.933 (95% CI, 0.922-0.943), 0.895 (95% CI, 0.882-0.907), 0.931 (95% CI, 0.921-0.942), and 0.740 (95% CI, 0.685-0.796), respectively; whereas those in the testing set are:0.921 (95% CI, 0.904-0.938), 0.876 (95% CI, 0.855-0.897), 0.921 (95% CI, 0.904-0.937), and 0.721 (95% CI, 0.629-0.814), respectively. The DeLong test results confirm that all deep learning models are superior to clinical one. Conclusion: The PET/CT images based on trained CNNs effectively predict

Indexed as

18F-FDG PET/CTdeep learningEGFRlung adenocarcinomamutation

Identifiers

PMID39735601
PMCPMC11671303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.