Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735533›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Development of a urine-based metabolomics approach for multi-cancer screening and tumor origin prediction.

Xinping Xu, Chunyan Zeng, Bei Qing, Yun He, Guodong Song, Jiaojiao Wang, Shuqi Yu, Tao Zhang, Qingyan Wei, Li Liu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Applications and Advances of Metabolomics in Lung Cancer Research].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Xinping Xu *Jiangxi Institute of Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Chunyan Zeng *The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Bei Qing *The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yun He *Metanotitia Inc., Shenzhen, China.
Guodong SongThe Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Jiaojiao WangMetanotitia Inc., Shenzhen, China.
Shuqi YuMetanotitia Inc., Shenzhen, China.
Tao ZhangMetanotitia Inc., Shenzhen, China.
Qingyan WeiMetanotitia Inc., Shenzhen, China.
Li LiuMetanotitia Inc., Shenzhen, China.
He WenMetanotitia Inc., Shenzhen, China.
Junyuan HuMetanotitia Inc., Shenzhen, China.
Wei ZhangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yan LiMetanotitia Inc., Shenzhen, China.
Youxiang ChenThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zhenkun XiaThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. A non-invasive screening solution was required for early diagnosis of cancer. Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests have been considered to address the challenge by simultaneously identifying multiple types of cancer within a single test using minimally invasive blood samples. However, a multi-cancer screening strategy utilizing urine-based metabolomics has not yet been developed. Methods: We enrolled 911 cancer patients with 548 lung cancer (LC), 177 with gastric cancer (GC), and 186 with colorectal cancer (CRC), alongside 563 individuals with non-cancerous benign diseases and 229 healthy controls (HC) and investigated the metabolic profiles of urine samples. Participants were randomly allocated to discovery and validation cohorts. The discovery cohort was used for identifying multi-cancer and tissue-specific signatures to build the cancer screening and tumor origin prediction models, while the validation cohort was employed for assessing the performance of these models. Results: We identified and annotated a total of 360 metabolites from the urine samples. Using the LASSO regression algorithm, 18 metabolites were characterized as urinary metabolic biomarkers and exhibited excellent discriminative performance between cancer patients and HC with AUC of 0.96 in the validation cohort. In comparison with the performance of traditional tumor markers CEA, the screening model performed higher sensitivity across the cancer stages, with a particularly increase in sensitivity among early-stage cancer patients. Moreover, the screening model also exhibited in high classification of cancers from non-cancerous group, comprising with HC and benign disease participants. Furthermore, two non-overlapping metabolic panels were selected to differentiate LC from Non-LC and GC from CRC with the AUC values of 0.87 and 0.83 in validation cohorts, respectively. Additionally, the model accurately predicted the origin of three lethal cancers: lung, gastric, and colorectal, with an overall accuracy of 0.75. The AUC values for LC, GC, and CRC were 0.88, 0.88, and 0.80, respectively. Discussion: Our study demonstrates the potential of urine-based metabolomics for multi-cancer early detection. The approach offers non-invasive cancer screening, promising widespread implementation in population-based programs for early detection and improved outcomes. Further validation and expansion are needed for broader clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerMetabolomicsAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMetabolomeMiddle AgedNeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumormachine learningmulti-cancer screeningpathwaytumor origin predictionurinary metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID39735533
PMCPMC11671364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.