Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735530›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024

Patterns of immune evasion in triple-negative breast cancer and new potential therapeutic targets: a review.

Lucía Serrano García, Beatriz Jávega, Antonio Llombart Cussac, María Gión, José Manuel Pérez-García, Javier Cortés, María Leonor Fernández-Murga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucía Serrano GarcíaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Beatriz JávegaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Antonio Llombart CussacMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
María GiónMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
José Manuel Pérez-GarcíaMedica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Oncoclínicas & Co., Jersey City, NJ, United States.
Javier CortésMedica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Oncoclínicas & Co., Jersey City, NJ, United States.
María Leonor Fernández-MurgaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer characterized by the absence of progesterone and estrogen receptors and low (or absent) HER2 expression. TNBC accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancers. It is associated with younger age, a higher mutational burden, and an increased risk of recurrence and mortality. Standard treatment for TNBC primarily relies on cytotoxic agents, such as taxanes, anthracyclines, and platinum compounds for both early and advanced stages of the disease. Several targeted therapies, including bevacizumab and sunitinib, have failed to demonstrate significant clinical benefit in TNBC. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has revolutionized cancer treatment. By stimulating the immune system, ICIs induce a durable anti-tumor response across various solid tumors. TNBC is a particularly promising target for treatment with ICIs due to the higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), increased PD-L1 expression, and higher mutational burden, which generates tumor-specific neoantigens that activate immune cells. ICIs administered as monotherapy in advanced TNBC yields only a modest response; however, response rates significantly improve when ICIs are combined with cytotoxic agents, particularly in tumors expressing PD-L1. Pembrolizumab is approved for use in both early and advanced TNBC in combination with standard chemotherapy. However, more research is needed to identify more potent biomarkers, and to better elucidate the synergism of ICIs with other targeted agents. In this review, we explore the challenges of immunotherapy in TNBC, examining the mechanisms of tumor progression mediated by immune cells within the tumor microenvironment, and the signaling pathways involved in both primary and acquired resistance. Finally, we provide a comprehensive overview of ongoing clinical trials underway to investigate novel immune-targeted therapies for TNBC.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMolecular Targeted TherapyTumor EscapeTumor MicroenvironmentImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsimmunosuppressionimmunotherapysignaling pathwaytherapeutic targettriple negative breast cancertumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39735530
PMCPMC11671371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.