ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2024
Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound Compared to Chest Radiography for Diagnosing Pneumonia in Children: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-driven framework for differentiating pediatric bronchopneumonia from lobar pneumonia: a multicenter investigation.European journal of medical research · 2025Trial
- Lung ultrasound versus chest X-ray in pediatric lower respiratory tract infections at a tertiary center: a prospective observational study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Pediatrics advances in 2024: choices in allergy, cardiology, critical care, endocrinology, gastroenterology, immunology, infectious diseases, neonatology, nephrology, neurology, nutrition, palliative care respiratory tract illnesses, and social media.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditionally, pediatric pneumonia is diagnosed through clinical examination and chest radiography (CXR), with computed tomography (CT) reserved for complications. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained popularity due to its portability and absence of ionizing radiation. This study evaluates LUS's accuracy compared to CXR in diagnosing pneumonia in children. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from April to September 2023 involving 108 children aged 14 or younger admitted with pneumonia. Each child underwent LUS using a 5-zone scanning protocol, followed by CXR, with the latter interpreted independently by two consultant radiologists. Agreement between LUS and CXR for diagnosing consolidation and interstitial pneumonia patterns was assessed using Cohen's Kappa (k) with SPSS version 26.0. Results: Pneumonia was radiographically confirmed in 79 children (73.1%). LUS detected consolidation in 41.7% of cases, compared to 43.5% for CXR, demonstrating a sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 95.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.6%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.4%. LUS showed higher accuracy for interstitial lung patterns (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 97.4%). The agreement between LUS and CXR was excellent, with Cohen's Kappa values of 0.908 for consolidation and 0.863 for interstitial pneumonia. LUS also identified more pleural effusions (11.1%) compared to CXR (6.5%). Conclusion: LUS demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to CXR for pneumonia, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity for pneumonia-related features. It outperforms CXR in detecting small-volume consolidations and effusions, supporting its routine use in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.