Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735439›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Center2024

TDERS, an exosome RNA-derived signature predicts prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in clear cell renal cell cancer: a multicohort study.

Aimin Jiang, Ying Liu, Ziwei He, Wenqiang Liu, Qiwei Yang, Yu Fang, Baohua Zhu, Xiaofeng Wu, Huamao Ye, Bicheng Ye and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Center, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Expression and prognostic significance of CRKL in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.American journal of clinical and experimental immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Aimin JiangDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Ying LiuDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Ziwei HeDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Wenqiang LiuDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Qiwei YangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yu FangDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Baohua ZhuDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Xiaofeng WuDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Huamao YeDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Bicheng YeSchool of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Yangzhou Polytechnic College, Yangzhou, China.
Shunxiang GaoEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Le QuDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Wenhao XuDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Peng LuoDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Linhui WangDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tumor-derived exosomes are involved in tumor progression and immune invasion and might function as promising noninvasive approaches for clinical management. However, there are few reports on exosom-based markers for predicting the progression and adjuvant therapy response rate among patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Methods: The signatures differentially expressed in exosomes from tumor and normal tissues from ccRCC patients were correspondingly deregulated in ccRCC tissues. We adopted a two-step strategy, including Lasso and bootstrapping, to construct a novel risk stratification system termed the TDERS (Tumor-Derived Exosome-Related Risk Score). During the testing and validation phases, we leveraged multiple external datasets containing over 2000 RCC cases from eight cohorts and one inhouse cohort to evaluate the accuracy of the TDERS. In addition, enrichment analysis, immune infiltration signatures, mutation landscape and therapy sensitivity between the high and low TDERS groups were compared. Finally, the impact of TDERS on the tumor microenvironment (TME) was also analysed in our single-cell datasets. Results: TDERS consisted of 12 mRNAs deregulated in both exosomes and tissues from patients with ccRCC. TDERS achieved satisfactory performance in both prognosis and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response across all ccRCC cohorts and other pathological types, since the average area under the curve (AUC) to predict 5-year overall survival (OS) was larger than 0.8 across the four cohorts. Patients in the TDERS high group were resistant to ICIs, while mercaptopurine might function as a promising agent for those patients. Patients with a high TDERS were characterized by coagulation and hypoxia, which induced hampered tumor antigen presentation and relative resistance to ICIs. In addition, single cells from 12 advanced samples validated this phenomenon since the interaction between dendritic cells and macrophages was limited. Finally, PLOD2, which is highly expressed in fibro- and epi‑tissue, could be a potential therapeutic target for ccRCC patients since inhibiting PLOD2 altered the malignant phenotype of ccRCC Conclusion: As a novel, non-invasive, and repeatable monitoring tool, the TDERS could work as a robust risk stratification system for patients with ccRCC and precisely inform treatment decisions about ICI therapy.

Indexed as

ExosomeImmunotherapy responseMultiomicsNon-invasive biopsyPLOD2Renal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39735439
PMCPMC11674438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.