ArticleJournal of cytology
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Ovarian Tumors With Histopathological Correlation: A Revisit to Borderline Category.
Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) comprise 15%-20% of all ovarian epithelial malignancies. The majority of them are serous tumors followed by mucinous tumors. Pre-operative cytological diagnosis plays an important role with histopathology being the gold standard. The present study aimed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of cytology in the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian tumors with special emphasis on the cytologically borderline category. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted in our institute over five years from January 2017 to December 2022. This was a retrospective study and included 92 patients with ovarian masses who were subjected to ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) as a preliminary diagnostic procedure. Cytology smears were examined and categorized as benign, borderline, and malignant. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were assessed considering histopathology as the gold standard. Results: In the present study, 92 ovarian FNA cytology were performed. Aspirates were adequate in all but 10 cases. Out of 82 cases, 75 were epithelial tumors. Twelve cases of BOTs were compiled and cytological findings were assessed. Conclusion: To conclude, diagnosis of BOTs on cytology is difficult, however, aspiration from multiple sites from the lesion, critical cytomorphological assessment, and cell-block preparation with immunocytochemistry/immunohistochemistry can overcome the pitfalls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.