Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735366›Full record

ArticleJournal of cytology

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Ovarian Tumors With Histopathological Correlation: A Revisit to Borderline Category.

Zoya Hasan, Meeta Singh, Jyoti Singh, Gautam Chellani, Irfana Nisam, Garima Rakheja, Shyama Jain, Nita Khurana, Shramana Mandal, Arun K Rathi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zoya HasanDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Meeta SinghDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Jyoti SinghDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Gautam ChellaniDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Irfana NisamDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Garima RakhejaDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Shyama JainDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Nita KhuranaDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Shramana MandalDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Arun K RathiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Yedla M MalaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Radhika BatraDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) comprise 15%-20% of all ovarian epithelial malignancies. The majority of them are serous tumors followed by mucinous tumors. Pre-operative cytological diagnosis plays an important role with histopathology being the gold standard. The present study aimed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of cytology in the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian tumors with special emphasis on the cytologically borderline category. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted in our institute over five years from January 2017 to December 2022. This was a retrospective study and included 92 patients with ovarian masses who were subjected to ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) as a preliminary diagnostic procedure. Cytology smears were examined and categorized as benign, borderline, and malignant. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were assessed considering histopathology as the gold standard. Results: In the present study, 92 ovarian FNA cytology were performed. Aspirates were adequate in all but 10 cases. Out of 82 cases, 75 were epithelial tumors. Twelve cases of BOTs were compiled and cytological findings were assessed. Conclusion: To conclude, diagnosis of BOTs on cytology is difficult, however, aspiration from multiple sites from the lesion, critical cytomorphological assessment, and cell-block preparation with immunocytochemistry/immunohistochemistry can overcome the pitfalls.

Indexed as

Borderline ovarian tumorsCA-125ovarian massUSG-guided FNAC

Identifiers

PMID39735366
PMCPMC11676087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.