ArticleBioactive materials2025
A ceramic microbridge microfluidic chip to study osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in bioactive ceramic immune microenvironment.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crosstalk in the brain tumor microenvironment: mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and clinical advances.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Hydrogel-WrappedMaterials today. Bio · 2025Article
- From Basic to Breakthroughs: The Journey of Microfluidic Devices in Hydrogel Droplet Generation.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioactive ceramics have been used in bone tissue repair and regeneration. However, because of the complex in vivo osteogenesis process, long cycle, and difficulty of accurately tracking, the mechanism of interaction between materials and cells has yet to be fully understood, hindering its development. The ceramic microbridge microfluidic chip system may solve the problem and provide an in vitro method to simulate the microenvironment in vivo. Nevertheless, the complex microenvironment parameters of the chip system need to be studied in detail. Computer simulation bionics can provide clues for the setting of microenvironment parameters. This study used a computational bionic model to simulate the bone growth process in the presence of immune-related factors. The osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells of calcium phosphate ceramics in a macrophage-dominated immune microenvironment was studied using a microfluidic chip system. The computational biomimetic model and microfluidic chip findings were basically consistent with the reported results of the animal experiments. These findings suggest that studying the osteogenic behavior of calcium phosphate ceramics using a microfluidic chip model is feasible. The method model provided in this study can be extended to other biomaterials, providing a viable path for their research and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.