Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735300›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2024

Microdissection and Single-Cell Suspension of Neocortical Layers From Ferret Brain for Single-Cell Assays.

Lucia Del-Valle-Anton, Salma Amin, Víctor Borrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucia Del-Valle-AntonInstituto de Neurociencias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas & Universidad Miguel Hernández, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain.
Salma AminInstituto de Neurociencias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas & Universidad Miguel Hernández, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain.
Víctor BorrellInstituto de Neurociencias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas & Universidad Miguel Hernández, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain development is highly complex and dynamic. During this process, the different brain structures acquire new components, such as the cerebral cortex, which builds up different germinal and cortical layers during its development. The genetic study of this complex structure has been commonly approached by bulk-sequencing of the entire cortex as a whole. Here, we describe the methodology to study this layered tissue in all its complexity by microdissecting two germinal layers at two developmental time points. This protocol is combined with a step-by-step explanation of tissue dissociation that provides high-quality cells ready to be analyzed by the newly developed single-cell assays, such as scRNA-seq, scATAC-seq, and TrackerSeq. Altogether, this approach increases the resolution of the genetic analyses from the cerebral cortex compared to bulk studies. It also facilitates the study of laboratory animal models that recapitulate human cortical development better than mice, like ferrets. Key features • Microdissection of individual germinal layers in the developing cerebral cortex from living brain slices. • Enzymatic and mechanical dissociation generates single-cell suspensions available for high-throughput single-cell assays. • Protocol optimized for embryonic and early postnatal ferret cortex.

Indexed as

Cell concentrationCell viabilityCerebral cortexFerretLateral sulcusMicrodissectionOuter subventricular zoneSingle-cell suspensionSplenial gyrusVentricular zone

Identifiers

PMID39735300
PMCPMC11669907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.