Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735291›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2024

CRISPR/Cas9-Based Protocol for Precise Genome Editing in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Avinash Singh, Swathy Babu, Marcus Phan, Shauna H Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Avinash SinghDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Swathy BabuDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Marcus PhanDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Shauna H YuanDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Predoctoral Training of NeuroscientistsT32NS105604 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS105604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9-based genome editing has marked a significant advancement in genetic engineering technology. However, the editing of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with CRISPR presents notable challenges in ensuring cell survival and achieving high editing efficiency. These challenges become even more complex when considering the specific target site. P53 activation as a result of traditional CRISPR editing can lead to apoptosis, potentially worsening cell health or even resulting in cell death. Mitigating this apoptotic response can enhance cell survival post-CRISPR editing, which will ultimately increase editing efficiency. In our study, we observed that combining p53 inhibition with pro-survival small molecules yields a homologous recombination rate of over 90% when using CRISPR in human iPSCs. This protocol significantly streamlines the editing process and reduces the time and resources necessary for creating isogenic lines. Key features • The combination of p53 inhibition and pro-survival small molecules promotes cell survival and increases the efficiency of genome editing. • Genome editing can be completed in as little as 8 weeks for iPSCs, significantly reducing the total time required. • Achieves a homologous recombination rate of over 90% in human iPSCs.

Indexed as

CRISPR Cas9Editing efficiencyHomologous recombination rateiPSCsNucleofection

Identifiers

PMID39735291
PMCPMC11669859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.