ArticleBio-protocol2024
CRISPR/Cas9-Based Protocol for Precise Genome Editing in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR/Cas-Based Ex Vivo Gene Therapy and Lysosomal Storage Disorders: A Perspective Beyond Cas9.Cells · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas-edited iPSCs and mesenchymal stem cells: a concise review of their potential in thalassemia therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9-based genome editing has marked a significant advancement in genetic engineering technology. However, the editing of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with CRISPR presents notable challenges in ensuring cell survival and achieving high editing efficiency. These challenges become even more complex when considering the specific target site. P53 activation as a result of traditional CRISPR editing can lead to apoptosis, potentially worsening cell health or even resulting in cell death. Mitigating this apoptotic response can enhance cell survival post-CRISPR editing, which will ultimately increase editing efficiency. In our study, we observed that combining p53 inhibition with pro-survival small molecules yields a homologous recombination rate of over 90% when using CRISPR in human iPSCs. This protocol significantly streamlines the editing process and reduces the time and resources necessary for creating isogenic lines. Key features • The combination of p53 inhibition and pro-survival small molecules promotes cell survival and increases the efficiency of genome editing. • Genome editing can be completed in as little as 8 weeks for iPSCs, significantly reducing the total time required. • Achieves a homologous recombination rate of over 90% in human iPSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.