Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735286›Full record

ArticleHealth care science2024

SkinSage XAI: An explainable deep learning solution for skin lesion diagnosis.

Geetika Munjal, Paarth Bhardwaj, Vaibhav Bhargava, Shivendra Singh, Nimish Nagpal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geetika MunjalAmity School of Engineering and Technology Amity University Noida Noida Uttar Pradesh India.ORCID 0000-0001-5213-9993
Paarth BhardwajAmity School of Engineering and Technology Amity University Noida Noida Uttar Pradesh India.
Vaibhav BhargavaAmity School of Engineering and Technology Amity University Noida Noida Uttar Pradesh India.
Shivendra SinghAmity School of Engineering and Technology Amity University Noida Noida Uttar Pradesh India.
Nimish NagpalAmity School of Engineering and Technology Amity University Noida Noida Uttar Pradesh India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Skin cancer poses a significant global health threat, with early detection being essential for successful treatment. While deep learning algorithms have greatly enhanced the categorization of skin lesions, the black-box nature of many models limits interpretability, posing challenges for dermatologists. Methods: To address these limitations, SkinSage XAI utilizes advanced explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques for skin lesion categorization. A data set of around 50,000 images from the Customized HAM10000, selected for diversity, serves as the foundation. The Inception v3 model is used for classification, supported by gradient-weighted class activation mapping and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations algorithms, which provide clear visual explanations for model outputs. Results: SkinSage XAI demonstrated high performance, accurately categorizing seven types of skin lesions-dermatofibroma, benign keratosis, melanocytic nevus, vascular lesion, actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma. It achieved an accuracy of 96%, with precision at 96.42%, recall at 96.28%, Conclusions: SkinSage XAI represents a significant advancement in dermatology and artificial intelligence by bridging gaps in accuracy and explainability. The system provides transparent, accurate diagnoses, improving decision-making for dermatologists and potentially enhancing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

deep learningexplainable artificial intelligenceGradCAMHAM10000LIMEskin lesions

Identifiers

PMID39735286
PMCPMC11671215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.