Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735231›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

Efficient dataset extension using generative networks for assessing degree of coating degradation around scribe.

Dominik Stursa, Pavel Rozsival, Petr Dolezel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dominik StursaFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czechia.
Pavel RozsivalFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czechia.
Petr DolezelFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel methodology for dataset augmentation in the semantic segmentation of coil-coated surface degradation is presented in this study. Deep convolutional generative adversarial networks (DCGAN) are employed to generate synthetic input-target pairs, which closely resemble real-world data, with the goal of expanding an existing dataset. These augmented datasets are used to train two state-of-the-art models, U-net, and DeepLabV3, for the precise detection of degradation areas around scribes. In a series of experiments, it was demonstrated that the introduction of synthetic data improves the models' performance in detecting degradation, especially when the ratio of synthetic to real data is carefully managed. Results indicate that optimal improvements in accuracy and F1-score are achieved when the ratio of synthetic to original data is between 0.2 and 0.5. Moreover, the advantages and limitations of different GAN architectures for dataset expansion are explored, with specific attention to their ability to produce realistic and diverse samples. This work offers a scalable solution to the challenges associated with creating large and diverse annotated datasets for industrial applications of coil coating degradation assessment. The proposed approach provides a significant contribution by improving model generalization and segmentation accuracy while reducing the burden of manual data annotation. These findings have important implications for industries relying on coil coatings, as more efficient and accurate degradation detection methods are enabled.

Indexed as

coil coatingdeep learningdegradationdelaminationgenerative adversarial networksemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39735231
PMCPMC11671473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.