Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735202›Full record

ArticleProstate international2024

Oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy of localized prostate cancer: stratified by magnetic resonance imaging and risk classification.

Gyoohwan Jung, Byeongdo Song, Hyungwoo Ahn, Sung Il Hwang, Hak Jong Lee, Ki Young Huh, Sang Hun Song, Sangchul Lee, Seok-Soo Byun, Sung Kyu Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gyoohwan JungDepartment of Urology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Byeongdo SongDepartment of Urology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Kyunggi-Do, Korea.
Hyungwoo AhnDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sung Il HwangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hak Jong LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Ki Young HuhDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Hun SongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sangchul LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Seok-Soo ByunDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sung Kyu HongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We investigated whether combining T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical risk categories improves upon established prognostic indicators of oncological outcomes in prostate cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, but not preoperative hormone therapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy, for localized prostate cancer at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from October 2007 to April 2016 were included. MRIs were classified according to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). Patients were divided into the following five groups: 1, no focal suspicious lesion; 2, organ-confined suspicious lesion PI-RADS ≤3; 3, organ-confined suspicious lesion PI-RADS 4 or 5; 4, suspicious lesion with extraprostatic extension (EPE), no seminal vesicle invasion (SVI); 5, suspicious lesion with EPE and SVI. Risk classified according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and MRI findings were combined to analyze survival curves for biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free and metastasis-free survival. The area under a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic was analyzed for event prediction after 5 years. Results: We analyzed 1,290 patients. In multivariate Cox regression models, PI-RADS ≥4 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.33, Conclusion: Combining prostate MRI with NCCN risk classification improves the prediction value of BCR following radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Biochemical recurrenceMagnetic resonance imagingMetastasisProstate cancerRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID39735202
PMCPMC11681324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.