ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024
Comparison of crisis response planning and treatment as usual for active duty service members at risk for suicide: Study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in a military treatment facility.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05795764 (Moderators of the Effectiveness of Crisis Response Planning), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Moderators of the Effectiveness of Crisis Response Planning (CRP) for Military Personnel
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suicide is one of the leading causes of death among U.S. service members, and rates of suicide among military personnel have increased over the past two decades. To address this serious issue, effective preventive treatments are needed in settings where at-risk service members are frequently seen, such as emergency departments and inpatient psychiatric units. This study will compare the longitudinal effects of crisis response planning (CRP) and treatment as usual (TAU) on suicidal thoughts and behaviors among active duty service members seeking emergent care for suicidality at a military treatment facility. Methods: The current study is conducted through a consortium, Augmenting Suicide Prevention Interventions for Service Members. This article details an ongoing stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial that compares rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors among service members at risk for suicide following care from CRP-trained providers versus untrained providers (i.e., TAU). Participants complete assessments at pretreatment and every 3 months up to 1 year. Primary outcomes include suicide attempts and behaviors, and suicidal ideation is a secondary outcome. Moderators of treatment effects will also be examined. The methodological development of this trial is discussed, along with clinical and ethical considerations for suicide prevention research in emergency, inpatient, and military treatment settings. Conclusion: Providing evidence-based treatment for suicidality that addresses service members' unique needs is crucial to reduce suicide rates and facilitate mental health recovery in this population. This study aims to inform future implementation and dissemination of CRP in healthcare systems to ultimately decrease suicide among service members. Clinical trials identifier: NCT05795764.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.