Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735126›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Evaluating the Impact of a Virtual Skin Cancer Awareness Workshop for 16-19-Year-Olds.

Maya Dyson, Anna Corriero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maya DysonInternal Medicine, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Anna CorrieroMedical Education, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction  The incidence of malignant melanoma (MM) in the United Kingdom (UK) has significantly increased in recent years and is expected to continue to rise over the next decade. Despite the preventable nature of most MM cases, existing evidence suggests that public health education around skin cancer and sun safety is often suboptimal, particularly for secondary school populations. Unlike primary school curricula, there is no national guidance to mandate the teaching of this topic in secondary school. Early intervention through education can encourage sun-safe practices, and therefore potentially reduce the risk of MM developing. The primary aim of this study was to improve awareness of skin cancer, including its risk factors and preventive measures, amongst sixth-form students.  Methods  An online workshop was organised by In2MedSchool, a national widening access charitable scheme for aspiring medical students, in collaboration with the Karen Clifford Skin Cancer Charity. Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology was utilised to design and evaluate a skin cancer awareness and sun safety workshop. It addressed key topics such as MM risk factors, preventive measures, and the widely used 'ABCDE' assessment of MM. A total of 73 students from across the UK attended the virtual workshop. To maximise engagement, visual aids, low-stakes quizzing, and an interactive chat function were utilised.  Participants completed anonymous pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, assessing their confidence and knowledge in understanding skin cancer risk factors and sun-safe behaviours. Confidence levels were measured using a seven-point Likert scale, and knowledge was evaluated through a ten-question assessment. Statistical analyses, including averages, medians, interquartile ranges (IQR), and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess the changes in participants' knowledge and confidence.  Results  Before the intervention, participants reported an average confidence score of 4.07 in understanding skin cancer risk factors, which significantly improved to 6.39 after the workshop, representing a 57.09% increase (p < 0.00001). Confidence in applying protective measures increased by 45.67%, from 4.51 to 6.57 (p < 0.00001). In addition, most students expressed feeling underprepared by existing sun safety programs at both primary and secondary school levels.  Knowledge assessments demonstrated significant improvement, with average scores increasing from 7.49 pre-intervention to 9.10 post-intervention (21.46% improvement, p < 0.00001). The median score increased from 8 (IQR: 3) to 9 (IQR: 1) following the workshop, demonstrating a notable increase in understanding of skin cancer risk factors, protective behaviours, and early detection methods.  Conclusion  Our findings indicate that many secondary school students feel unprepared regarding existing skin cancer awareness and sun safety programs in school. This study provides evidence to suggest that targeted, interactive workshops have the potential to improve awareness and knowledge of this important topic in the short term. However, participants in this cohort are likely to have an established interest in medicine and healthcare, beyond that of their wider peer group. This limits the broader application of our findings. Further research that explores the longer-term impact of such interventions, including changes in attitudes and behaviours, is recommended.

Indexed as

dermatologymedical educationmelanomaskin cancerwidening participation

Identifiers

PMID39735126
PMCPMC11681837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.