Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735111›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Measurement of Tip Load With a Pacemaker Lead Stylet and Guiding Catheter Using a Silicone Heart Model.

Daisuke Yamazaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daisuke YamazakiCardiology, Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Ventricular septal pacing has long been performed using a stylet during pacemaker implantation, but with the availability of guiding catheters, His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing have also been performed. However, it is not known to what extent the tip load of the ventricular lead differs when a guiding catheter is used compared with a stylet alone. In this study, the tip load was measured for different stylet stiffness and guiding catheter geometries at sites where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed. Method A small weighing instrument was placed in the right ventricular septal portion of the silicone heart model to measure the apical load of the ventricular lead when using two types of guiding catheters and three different types of stylets according to stiffness at the site where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed. Results The guiding catheter group had by far the highest tip load compared to the stylet group (Site Selective Pacing Catheter (SSPC) multipurpose group 17.9 ± 1.6 g, SSPC extended hook group 3.6 ± 0.8 g). There was no significant difference in tip load between His bundle pacing site and the left bundle branch area pacing site for the normally used stiffness stylet. Conclusions Guiding catheters are used for conduction system pacing but must be used with great care as they apply a much greater tip load than conventional lead placement with a stylet alone.

Indexed as

guiding catheterhis bundle pacingleft bundle blanch area pacingright ventricular septal pacingstylettip load

Identifiers

PMID39735111
PMCPMC11682690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.