ArticleCureus2024
Measurement of Tip Load With a Pacemaker Lead Stylet and Guiding Catheter Using a Silicone Heart Model.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac lead perforation: Mechanisms, detection, and therapeutic approaches.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Ventricular septal pacing has long been performed using a stylet during pacemaker implantation, but with the availability of guiding catheters, His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing have also been performed. However, it is not known to what extent the tip load of the ventricular lead differs when a guiding catheter is used compared with a stylet alone. In this study, the tip load was measured for different stylet stiffness and guiding catheter geometries at sites where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed. Method A small weighing instrument was placed in the right ventricular septal portion of the silicone heart model to measure the apical load of the ventricular lead when using two types of guiding catheters and three different types of stylets according to stiffness at the site where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed. Results The guiding catheter group had by far the highest tip load compared to the stylet group (Site Selective Pacing Catheter (SSPC) multipurpose group 17.9 ± 1.6 g, SSPC extended hook group 3.6 ± 0.8 g). There was no significant difference in tip load between His bundle pacing site and the left bundle branch area pacing site for the normally used stiffness stylet. Conclusions Guiding catheters are used for conduction system pacing but must be used with great care as they apply a much greater tip load than conventional lead placement with a stylet alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.