ArticleCureus2024
Possibility of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression as a Treatment Selection Indicator in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Immunotherapy for HER2 Low-Expressing Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the relationship among human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression level, pathological complete response (pCR) rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and prognosis in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methodology This retrospective study analyzed the relationship among HER2 expression level, pCR rate, clinicopathological factors, and prognosis in 39 patients who were diagnosed with TNBC between 2012 and 2020 at Osaka Rosai Hospital and underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Results Patients' age ranged 33-86 (median = 57) years, and the observation period ranged 5-130 (median = 60) months. The HER2 expression levels were HER2 (0), HER2 (1+), and HER2 (2+, fluorescence in situ hybridization test (FISH); negative) for 18, 12, and 9 cases, respectively. The pCR rates were 38.9%, 8.3%, and 44.4% for HER2 (0), HER2 (1+), and HER2 (2+, FISH; negative), respectively, and no correlation was observed with the degree of HER2 expression. The prognosis of distant disease-free survival (DDFS) differed depending on the HER2 status (p = 0.032), and this trend was also observed in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.012). This tendency became even stronger when comparing HER2-low and HER2 (0) (p = 0.028 and p = 0.01, respectively). HER2 expression was significantly decreased from before to after NAC (p = 0.001). Conclusions HER2 expression did not correlate with the pCR rate of NAC but did correlate with DDFS and OS. Thus, patients with an HER2 (0) status are considered to have a poor prognosis and should be more aggressively considered for perioperative chemotherapy, e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.