ArticleCureus2024
On-Call Simulation: A One-Day Comprehensive Simulation of Clinical Practice for Final-Year Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Transitioning from a medical student to a foundation doctor presents numerous challenges, particularly in managing on-call duties that require quick decision-making, clinical skills, and prioritisation under pressure. The Simulation On-Call (SOC) program was developed as a one-day, immersive simulation event to equip final-year medical students with the skills and confidence needed for these responsibilities. Methods The SOC program is an annual event held for final-year medical students at the Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK. It is conducted over five days, with 80 final-year medical students rotating through nine stations that replicated common on-call scenarios. Each station required students to address critical medical situations, such as managing an acutely unwell patient, electrolyte abnormalities, and referring and communicating with colleagues, while managing realistic interruptions through a "bleep" system. Pre- and post-event questionnaires, featuring 25 Likert-scale items, were disseminated to assess student feedback and self-reported confidence across competencies, including communication, clinical decision-making, and task prioritisation. A retrospective review and analysis of the feedback was performed to assess the impact of the SOC program by assessing the pre- and post-session questionnaires. Results Of the 80 participants, 70 completed the pre-event questionnaire, and 72 completed the post-event questionnaire. Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase in students' self-reported confidence across all 25 Likert-scale items, with marked improvements in task prioritisation (rₛ = 0.74, p < 0.001), managing acutely unwell patients (rₛ = 0.60, p < 0.001), and escalation skills (rₛ = 0.49, p < 0.001). Effect sizes ranged from moderate to large, underscoring the practical impact of the Simulation On-Call program in enhancing preparedness and confidence for on-call responsibilities. Conclusion The SOC program provided a valuable, realistic, and supportive environment for final-year medical students to practice on-call responsibilities. The significant improvement in student confidence highlights the effectiveness of this program as a preparatory tool for foundation doctors. Future iterations will incorporate feedback to continually refine the simulation experience, ensuring its alignment with clinical demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.