ArticleCureus2024
Prevalence and Clinical Features of Uterine Isthmocele Following Cesarean Sections: An Observational Study at Rabia Balkhi Hospital in Afghanistan.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cesarean Scar Defect (Isthmocele) and Secondary Infertility: A Systematic Review of Reproductive Significance.Cureus · 2026Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors of Coexisting Endometrial Lesions in Patients with Cesarean Scar Defect Undergoing Hysteroscopic Resection for Prolonged Menstruation.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- The Rising Global Cesarean Section Rates and Their Impact on Maternal and Child Health: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Urethral Leiomyoma in Pregnancy: A Rare Case of Symptomatic Pelvic Mass With Successful Surgical Management.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Uterine isthmocele, a defect in the uterine wall at the cesarean scar, is increasingly recognized due to the rising rate of cesarean deliveries. Often asymptomatic, it may lead to complications such as abnormal bleeding, chronic pelvic pain, secondary infertility, or uterine rupture during subsequent pregnancies. Objective This study aimed to assess the prevalence, clinical features, and associated risk factors of uterine isthmocele among women with previous cesarean scars over four years (2019-2023) at Rabia Balkhi Hospital, Afghanistan. Methods This observational study analyzed 9,207 women with prior cesarean sections, including 4,540 cases retrospectively (2019-2021) and 4,667 cases prospectively (2021-2023). The diagnosis was based on clinical evaluations and transvaginal ultrasonography. Data were analyzed using MS Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA), with statistical significance assessed for symptom associations and risk factors. Results Uterine isthmocele was identified in 58 women (0.63%). The most common symptom was abnormal uterine bleeding (78%, p < 0.001), followed by dysmenorrhea (48%, p = 0.793), chronic pelvic pain (31%, p = 0.004), secondary infertility (22%, p < 0.001), and hypovolemic shock (8.6%, p < 0.001). Women with three cesarean scars had the highest prevalence of isthmocele (46.5%, p < 0.001). Ultrasonography was effective in detecting isthmocele and evaluating post-surgical outcomes. Conclusion The study highlights the need for improved cesarean techniques, early ultrasonographic diagnosis, and standardized management protocols for uterine isthmocele. These findings provide a foundation for optimizing care in women with multiple cesarean scars and underscore the importance of early intervention to prevent complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.