ArticleCureus2024
Establishing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in a Developing Country: A Five-Year Experience at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Pakistan.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has increased over the past 25 to 30 years, driven by advancements in technology and a growing understanding of its benefits. This study evaluates the outcomes of 144 elective MICS procedures performed between January 2019 and September 2024. Methods Patients underwent various surgical approaches, including upper mini-sternotomy, mini-thoracotomy, and sub-xiphoid access. Patient demographics, preoperative characteristics, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. A total of 144 MICS procedures were performed. Results The cohort had a mean age of 30.72 years, with a nearly equal gender distribution, indicating that MICS can be performed safely in Pakistani patients. The mean ejection fraction was 53.58%, with hypertension being the most common comorbidity (22.2%). Aortic cannulation was primarily utilized, and aortic valve replacement (AVR) was the most common procedure (44.4%). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 95.9 ± 56.3 minutes and the mean aortic cross-clamp time was 62.22 ± 57.004 minutes, demonstrating efficient procedural times. The overall incidence of complications was low, supporting the safety and efficacy of MICS. Conclusion Our findings suggest that MICS is a viable and effective approach for a diverse patient population, with favorable clinical outcomes. The results underscore the potential for MICS to become standard practice in cardiothoracic surgery. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and the influence of comorbidities to further enhance MICS methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.