ArticleCureus2024
Does the Experience Level of Surgeons and Assistants Influence the Rate of Complications Following Appendicectomy?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Appendicectomies are the most frequently performed acute general surgery. The risk of complications depends on several factors, including patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), duration of symptoms, serum inflammatory markers, and the grade of inflammation. Prior research failed to demonstrate a relationship between the rate of complications and the surgeon's level of experience. It is unclear if the assistant's level of experience influences complication rates. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate the relationship between the surgeon's and assistant's position and the rate of complications following appendicectomy. We also explored whether more experienced staff were involved in higher-risk cases and their relationship with resource utilization. Results There was no significant difference in total complication rates based on the surgeon's and assistant's position (p = 0.48 and p = 0.99, respectively). Post-operative bleeding was the only complication that correlated with the assistant's level of experience (p = 0.002). More experienced surgeons performed faster appendicectomies (p =0.002), while the assistant's position had no influence (p = 0.47). There was no statistically significant relationship between the surgeon's and assistant's position, and post-operative length of admission, or risk factors for complications as measured by age, days of abdominal pain, white blood cell count (WCC), C-reactive protein (CRP), ASA, radiographic and intra-operative American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST). Conclusion Experienced surgeons performed faster appendicectomies. There was a trend toward higher rates of post-operative bleeding with less experienced assistants. Otherwise, there was no relationship between the surgeon's experience level and post-appendicectomy complication rates, length of post-operative stay, or patient risk factors for complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.