ArticleCureus2024
Navigation Experience in Latin-American Spine Surgeons: A Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designThis is a cross-sectional survey.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the availability and knowledge of navigation technologies for educational purposes and patient management in spine surgeons in Latin America.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among Latin American Spine Association members using a comprehensive 16-question survey to evaluate their knowledge and practices regarding navigation in spinal surgery. The questionnaire was reviewed and authorized by the AO Spine Latin America (LATAM) Degenerative & Deformity study group and distributed starting on January 29 and closed on February 28, 2024.
resultsA total of 123 surveys were recorded; 95% were male gender, and 42% were neurosurgeons/orthopedists with specific training in spine surgery. Mexico led the response rate with 55 (45%) and then Brazil and Argentina with 13% and 9%, respectively; 54% are not involved in a spine surgery training program; 80 surgeons belong to AO Spine membership; and 35 of them have over 20 years of experience, with most respondents performing between 0 and 100 surgeries per year and degenerative pathology being the most common. Almost 90% of the respondents either use or are willing to use navigation technology, 100% express interest in attending a course on the subject, 80% cited improved accuracy in screw placement as a perceived advantage, and the disadvantage of high costs was the most frequently selected (85%).
conclusionsDespite the benefits demonstrated by navigation technology, many spine surgeons in Latin America still lack access to this valuable resource. Even with their keen interest and clear understanding of its advantages and benefits, it is necessary to develop training programs and affordable navigation systems to improve spine surgery worldwide and ensure accessible care for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.