Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735038›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Resection of Multiple Oesophageal Schwannomas: A Case Report.

Jack Menzie, Thomas Eldredge, Liang Low

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack MenzieDepartment of General Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, AUS.
Thomas EldredgeDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, AUS.
Liang LowDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schwannomas are rare, benign tumours arising from Schwann cells, with oesophageal cases representing a small fraction. Their variety of symptoms and nonspecific imaging features often make preoperative diagnosis challenging, frequently requiring immunohistochemical staining for confirmation. We describe the case of a 62-year-old woman with progressive dysphagia, found to have a subepithelial mass at the gastroesophageal junction (GOJ). Imaging and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy confirmed an oesophageal schwannoma. The patient underwent robotic-assisted thoracoscopic excision, which allowed for precise tumour removal while avoiding a more extensive oesophagectomy. Intraoperatively, two distinct lobular tumours were identified and successfully excised without compromising the oesophageal mucosa. Postoperatively, the patient recovered well with resolution of symptoms and no evidence of residual tumour on follow-up imaging. This case highlights the potential of robotic-assisted approaches for treating oesophageal schwannomas, which can offer advantages in complex resections by improving surgical precision and reducing morbidity. Despite promising outcomes, robotic-assisted enucleation of oesophageal schwannomas remains rare, with few cases documented. This case supports robotic resection of oesophageal schwannomas as a feasible option in specialized settings, but further studies are needed to establish its role and develop recommendations.

Indexed as

esophageal tumorgastro-esophageal surgeryminimally invasive surgical proceduresrobotic surgical managementrobotic surgical proceduresrobotic thorascopic surgeryschwannomasurgical enucleationupper gi surgeryupper gi tumor

Identifiers

PMID39735038
PMCPMC11674935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.