ArticleCureus2024
A Comparative Analysis of Dexmedetomidine Infusion Rates on Hemodynamic Responses During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Although laparoscopic surgery is becoming more common, its anesthetic management poses challenges due to hemodynamic fluctuations. Dexmedetomidine has shown promise in mitigating these responses. In this study, we compared the effects of three different infusion doses of dexmedetomidine (0.2 µg/kg/hour, 0.4 µg/kg/hour, and 0.6 µg/kg/hour) on hemodynamic responses at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methodology An observational study was conducted among 90 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups, each receiving one of the three dexmedetomidine doses. Hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure, etc.) were monitored at various time points throughout the procedure. Results All three dexmedetomidine doses effectively attenuated hemodynamic responses. The 0.4 µg/kg/hour dose demonstrated the most stable blood pressure control, with minimal fluctuations from baseline. The 0.6 µg/kg/hour dose consistently resulted in lower mean blood pressure values. Heart rate was also more stable in the 0.4 µg/kg/hour group, while the 0.6 µg/kg/hour group consistently maintained lower heart rates. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine is a valuable anesthetic adjuvant for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with the 0.4 µg/kg/hour dose offering a favorable balance between hemodynamic stability and the potential risk of hypotension and bradycardia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.