Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39735032›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Comparative Analysis of Dexmedetomidine Infusion Rates on Hemodynamic Responses During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Observational Study.

Rachna Verma, Amra Nadeem, Narendra S Bafila, Sanni D Gautam, Deepak Kumar, Manoj K Giri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachna VermaAnaesthesiology, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, IND.
Amra NadeemAnaesthesiology, Dr. KNS Memorial Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, IND.
Narendra S BafilaAnaesthesiology, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, IND.
Sanni D GautamAnaesthesiology, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, IND.
Deepak KumarAnaesthesiology, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, IND.
Manoj K GiriAnaesthesia and Critical Care, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Although laparoscopic surgery is becoming more common, its anesthetic management poses challenges due to hemodynamic fluctuations. Dexmedetomidine has shown promise in mitigating these responses. In this study, we compared the effects of three different infusion doses of dexmedetomidine (0.2 µg/kg/hour, 0.4 µg/kg/hour, and 0.6 µg/kg/hour) on hemodynamic responses at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methodology An observational study was conducted among 90 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups, each receiving one of the three dexmedetomidine doses. Hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure, etc.) were monitored at various time points throughout the procedure. Results All three dexmedetomidine doses effectively attenuated hemodynamic responses. The 0.4 µg/kg/hour dose demonstrated the most stable blood pressure control, with minimal fluctuations from baseline. The 0.6 µg/kg/hour dose consistently resulted in lower mean blood pressure values. Heart rate was also more stable in the 0.4 µg/kg/hour group, while the 0.6 µg/kg/hour group consistently maintained lower heart rates. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine is a valuable anesthetic adjuvant for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with the 0.4 µg/kg/hour dose offering a favorable balance between hemodynamic stability and the potential risk of hypotension and bradycardia.

Indexed as

anesthetic adjuvantdexmedetomidinedose comparisonhemodynamic stabilitylaparoscopic cholecystectomy

Identifiers

PMID39735032
PMCPMC11671647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.