Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734993›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Connecting for Success: The Role of Networking in Medical Education.

Pinaki Wani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pinaki WaniPhysiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli, Raebareli, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Networking is a critical component of professional development in medical education, involving the establishment and maintenance of relationships that facilitate the exchange of information, resources, and opportunities. Defined as the process of creating and nurturing connections with peers, mentors, and collaborators, networking is essential for advancing research, enhancing career development, and improving clinical practice. This review explores the multifaceted role of networking in academia, emphasizing its importance for medical professionals who rely on collaborative efforts to drive innovation and improve patient care. Key benefits of strategic networking include access to interdisciplinary research opportunities, enhanced knowledge sharing, career advancement, and resource acquisition. However, networking in medical education is not without challenges. Time commitment and burnout, superficial relationships, exclusivity, ethical concerns, and professional jealousy are potential drawbacks that can hinder the effectiveness of networking efforts. Solutions to these challenges include balancing networking with other responsibilities, focusing on quality over quantity, ensuring inclusivity, and maintaining ethical standards in professional relationships. The review also provides practical tips for effective networking, such as engaging in formal and informal networking activities, leveraging technology, and building a professional online presence. By strategically participating in networking activities and overcoming common challenges, medical professionals can significantly enhance their academic growth, career opportunities, and contributions to the field. The overarching message is that investing in and nurturing professional networks is crucial for sustained success and advancement in medical education and research.

Indexed as

career advancementcollaborationmedical educationnetworkingprofessional developmentresearch opportunities

Identifiers

PMID39734993
PMCPMC11682727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.