ReviewCureus2024
Improving Quality of Care for Vacation-Related Emergency Department Visits: A Narrative Review of Patient Satisfaction and Contributing Factors.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergency radiology demand in a touristic region: residence status as a driver of imaging use.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Investigating Tourists' Emergency Healthcare Access Barriers: A Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Factors Associated With Recurrent Emergency Department Visits for Epistaxis in Adults, Cross Sectional Study in Two Tertiary Care Hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [Letter].Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- Three-year trends and seasonal variation in patient satisfaction with primary health care services in Saudi Arabia: results from the national patient experience measurement program (2022-2024).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency departments (EDs) encounter substantial challenges during peak vacation periods, including increased patient volumes, limited access to medical histories, language and cultural barriers, insurance complexities, and disruptions in continuity of care. These factors strain emergency department operations, resulting in prolonged wait times, diagnostic errors, and compromised care quality. This study reviews the literature to identify patient satisfaction indicators and common challenges and evaluate strategies to improve patient outcomes during vacation-related emergency department visits. Findings highlight critical issues in staffing and resource allocation, leading to delayed care. Limited interoperability of electronic health records (EHRs) often prevents access to essential patient information, increasing diagnostic errors and unnecessary repeat testing. Language and cultural barriers contribute to higher rates of misdiagnosis and lower patient satisfaction, while insurance and payment issues create delays, particularly for out-of-network or international patients. Effective strategies to address these challenges include the use of predictive analytics for better forecasting of patient volumes, specialized triage protocols, public health education campaigns, and telemedicine for remote management of non-critical conditions. These interventions help reduce wait times, optimize resource allocation, and improve patient satisfaction. By implementing adaptive approaches, such as flexible staffing models and enhanced electronic health record use, healthcare systems can significantly improve care delivery and patient outcomes during vacation seasons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.