ArticleCureus2024
Jigsaw as a Revision Module for Enhancing Learning in Biochemistry Among First-Year Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim Biochemistry includes the elaborate study of various biomolecules and intricate mechanisms that first-year medical students find difficult to understand and retain when taught through didactic lectures. Therefore, this study aims to test the effectiveness of jigsaw as a revision module in increasing the knowledge and retention capacity of students in Biochemistry. Materials and methods Eighty students were enrolled in the study. An MCQ-based pre-test was administered to students after a biochemistry topic was taught through a didactic lecture. Students were then divided into four groups led by a moderator. Each moderator divided their group of 20 students into four subgroups. Five subtopics from the lecture were assigned to each subgroup (one topic per student). The students receiving the same subtopic from all subgroups were teamed together to collectively study the subtopic within 30 minutes. Students then dispersed and joined their original subgroups to teach their subtopics to their peers (time allowed: 50 minutes). Thus, each student eventually learned five subtopics in a short period through self-directed learning. Post-tests and delayed post-tests were conducted after the jigsaw activity. Responses were analyzed through student t-tests and correlations. Results The post-test and delayed post-test scores were significantly higher than the pre-test scores, indicating an increase in knowledge and retention of information, respectively. The gain in scores was significantly higher in the "non-high achiever" vs. "high-achiever" group indicating that the jigsaw benefitted average and below-average students. The pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test scores showed significant correlations. Conclusions Jigsaw was found to be an effective revision exercise in biochemistry in improving the quality of medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.