Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734984›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Jigsaw as a Revision Module for Enhancing Learning in Biochemistry Among First-Year Medical Students.

Archana Nimesh, Rajani Kumawat, Saket Sinha, Harshitha Ramoju, Gitanjali Goyal, Akhilesh Pathak, Himanshu Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Archana NimeshDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjab, IND.
Rajani KumawatDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjab, IND.
Saket SinhaDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjab, IND.
Harshitha RamojuDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjab, IND.
Gitanjali GoyalDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjab, IND.
Akhilesh PathakDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjab, IND.
Himanshu SharmaDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjab, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim Biochemistry includes the elaborate study of various biomolecules and intricate mechanisms that first-year medical students find difficult to understand and retain when taught through didactic lectures. Therefore, this study aims to test the effectiveness of jigsaw as a revision module in increasing the knowledge and retention capacity of students in Biochemistry. Materials and methods Eighty students were enrolled in the study. An MCQ-based pre-test was administered to students after a biochemistry topic was taught through a didactic lecture. Students were then divided into four groups led by a moderator. Each moderator divided their group of 20 students into four subgroups. Five subtopics from the lecture were assigned to each subgroup (one topic per student). The students receiving the same subtopic from all subgroups were teamed together to collectively study the subtopic within 30 minutes. Students then dispersed and joined their original subgroups to teach their subtopics to their peers (time allowed: 50 minutes). Thus, each student eventually learned five subtopics in a short period through self-directed learning. Post-tests and delayed post-tests were conducted after the jigsaw activity. Responses were analyzed through student t-tests and correlations. Results The post-test and delayed post-test scores were significantly higher than the pre-test scores, indicating an increase in knowledge and retention of information, respectively. The gain in scores was significantly higher in the "non-high achiever" vs. "high-achiever" group indicating that the jigsaw benefitted average and below-average students. The pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test scores showed significant correlations. Conclusions Jigsaw was found to be an effective revision exercise in biochemistry in improving the quality of medical education.

Indexed as

biochemistryjigsawmedical educationmedical studentsrevisionself-directed learningteaching-learning method

Identifiers

PMID39734984
PMCPMC11682538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.