ArticleCureus2024
From Fragmented Facts to Unified Knowledge: Exploring Concept Mapping in Neuromuscular Physiology Among First-Year Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background First-year medical students may find it challenging to integrate complex physiological concepts, particularly neuromuscular physiology. While concept mapping has shown promise in medical education, its specific application in teaching intricate physiological mechanisms still needs to be explored. With this background, the objective of the study was to assess the feasibility of using concept mapping among first-year medical students and to explore the perception of students about concept mapping as an educational tool. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted with first-year medical students (n = 110) of the 2023-2024 batch at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India. A briefing on the basic theories of concept mapping was carried out. Students participated in a structured concept mapping session focusing on the mechanism of muscle contraction. Students (two students in a group) created concept maps illustrating relationships between neuronal architecture, action potentials, neuromuscular transmission, sarcotubular system, excitation-contraction coupling, and muscle contraction processes. Data collection included digital submissions of concept maps and structured feedback questionnaires. Two faculty members evaluated the concept maps, and student feedback was analyzed using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Results A total of 110 first-year undergraduate medical students participated in the study and created 55 concept maps. The students scored 17.32 ± 1.7 out of 20 maximum achievable scores, which corresponds to an average of 86.59%. Seventy-five (68.18%) students rated the technique as excellent, 32 (29.09%) found it good, and only three (2.73%) rated it as average. Ninety-eight (88.8%) students strongly agreed or agreed that it provided a practical learning experience and found it refreshing compared to traditional lectures. Additionally, 102 (92.7%) students acknowledged its ability to stimulate creative thinking, and 102 (92.7%) also reported effective collaboration with peers. According to 82 (74.5%) students, concept mapping also facilitated in-depth knowledge acquisition, demonstrating its effectiveness in promoting active, engaging, and collaborative learning. Qualitative analysis revealed that concept mapping helped the students organize complex information, encourage critical thinking, improve retention through visual learning, promote collaborative knowledge-building, and facilitate self-assessment of their understanding. Conclusion Concept mapping can be used as a pedagogical tool for teaching complex neuromuscular physiology concepts to first-year medical students. The technique can bridge the gap between fragmented knowledge and integrated understanding while promoting active learning and critical thinking. The majority of the students rated it as excellent or good. It significantly enhances engagement, creative thinking, and deeper subject understanding compared to traditional lectures. Qualitative feedback underscores its role in improving comprehension of complex concepts and critical thinking skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.