Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734975›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Clinical Profiles and Survival Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Center Study.

Jiss Joy, Kannan J, Satheesh Kumar, Mohamed Arshad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiss JoyMedical Oncology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, IND.
Kannan JMedical Oncology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, IND.
Satheesh KumarMedical Oncology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, IND.
Mohamed ArshadMedical Oncology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Ovarian cancer is the third most prevalent form of cancer among women in India. The majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Many women with late-stage ovarian cancer experience a recurrence and need subsequent treatment, even after initial therapy. The prognosis of patients who experience relapse after treatment is poor. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics and survival rates of individuals diagnosed with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods This retrospective study included patients with a relapse of epithelial ovarian carcinoma who were treated at the Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology (IOG), Madras Medical College, Chennai, India, over a period of six years, from January 2015 to December 2020. Results Sixty-six patients were enrolled in this study. The median patient age was 52 years. Most patients were postmenopausal (66.67%, n=44) and multiparous (75.76%, n=50). The most common histological type was serous (72.72%, n=48), and the majority of patients were in the later stages of the illness (83.34%, n=55). The median post-relapse survival of the study population was 23 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 20.61-25.39). The median survival of patients who were upfront stage I, II, III, and IV was 30, 13, 23, and nine months, respectively (p<0.05). Patients who underwent optimal cytoreduction had better survival rates than those who did not (28 versus 18 months, p<0.05). The median post-relapse survival was better in the platinum-sensitive group than in the platinum-resistant group (26 versus 16 months, p<0.05). Patients with a single relapse site had better survival rates than those with multiple sites of recurrence (26 versus 13 months, p<0.05). Patients with mucinous histology showed maximum survival (p<0.05). Individuals who initially underwent surgery had superior median survival rates following relapse compared to those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy as their first treatment (25 versus 23 months, p=0.404). Cox regression analysis revealed that platinum-sensitive patients were 4.204 times more likely to survive than platinum-resistant patients. Similarly, those presenting with single lesions were 7.275 times more likely to survive for a longer time than those with multiple lesions. Conclusion This study emphasizes the importance of achieving optimal cytoreduction and underscores the prognostic significance of platinum sensitivity and recurrence patterns in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Late detection can result in unfavorable outcomes.

Indexed as

high-grade serous ovarian carcinomaoptimal cytoreductionplatinum-resistant relapseplatinum-sensitive relapserecurrent ovarian cancersuboptimal cytoreduction

Identifiers

PMID39734975
PMCPMC11682545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.