ArticleCureus2024
Glasgow Prognostic Score and Outcomes in Elderly Head and Neck Cancer Surgery With Free-Flap Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of adjuvant nivolumab efficacy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Determining good candidates for head and neck cancer surgery in elderly patients requires consideration of various factors, such as overall health and social background, yet specific evaluation guidelines are lacking. The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) is a marker used to assess nutritional status and prognosis in cancer patients. Objective This study aims to evaluate the association between the GPS and both the prognosis and postoperative complications in reconstructive surgery cases for head and neck cancer in patients aged 80 and over. Materials and methods A total of 22 patients aged 80 and over who underwent reconstructive surgery in our department between January 2011 and December 2023 were included. Patients were divided into three groups based on their preoperative GPS scores (0, 1, and 2 points). The overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the association between GPS and prognosis, adjusting for confounders such as malnutrition, primary site, and comorbidities. The association between GPS and perioperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher was also examined. Results The mean age was 82.2 years, and 20 (90%) of the subjects had comorbidities. Higher GPS scores were associated with lower survival rates, and GPS was an independent prognostic factor. There was no significant association between GPS and perioperative complications of grade 3 or higher. Conclusion The GPS is a useful prognostic indicator in elderly patients undergoing reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer. However, a comprehensive evaluation such as the Geriatric 8, along with more inclusive malnutrition criteria, is recommended for an overall assessment of good candidates for the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.